A resounding no from me.That's all very well but the pressing question that should be asked on this forum is (get past the Jimmy Krankie thought) WOULD you give her one?
It would feel like shagging a provo.
A resounding no from me.That's all very well but the pressing question that should be asked on this forum is (get past the Jimmy Krankie thought) WOULD you give her one?
That's all very well but the pressing question that should be asked on this forum is (get past the Jimmy Krankie thought) WOULD you give her one?
She did take over from Alec Salmon. Next one will be Haddock ( grandson of a left back we once signed from Aberdeen).Well with her name she couldn't be anything else..![]()
I blame the Tories because they are a set of heartless twats who only care about the wealthy and to **** with the needy and sick..
That's all very well but the pressing question that should be asked on this forum is (get past the Jimmy Krankie thought) WOULD you give her one?
'The wealthy'.... Oh you mean the people that supply the majority of the jobs in this country, and the people who pay into society the most.
Lets have labour back in, and bankrupt the country again.
Time to let Scotland go for me.
Bankers are still at it with these " buy to let " loans lining the pockets at the expense of others. Student loans and zero hours contracts are all bad concepts I thought I would never see. How times have changed from when I was a happy hippy.
is going to rip the union apart.
I couldn't disagree with this woman any more if it was possible to do so. But the woman is so bloody good in front of a camera she has no idea just how dangerous she is!
Nicola Sturgeon is going to do more damage to the union than any king has over the last 5 centuries!
..Sturgeon and Salmond may be astute and practised politicians, but neither have kids (no stake in the future, Salmond married somebody old enough to be his mother, would he get on with Rooney?) they only care for themselves and wish to be King and Queen
Labour didn't leave the country in deficit - Northern Rock did - Labour bailed them out - at the time of the beginning of the bail-out, The country was not in deficit - in fact it was the opposite - then Northern Rock ****ed everything up and Labour ensure that the wealthy and non-wealthy people that banked with them were still entitled to their money - if Labour hadn't done this then the deficit would be far less but the people who had their houses/savings etc through Northern Rock would be homeless and skint. What would you rather a government did? Leave people to lose their homes or bail them out by borrowing money? The tories would've done EXACTLY the same but their excuse would've been that they did it to save people. It's a commonly misrepresented fact by the Tories'The wealthy'.... Oh you mean the people that supply the majority of the jobs in this country, and the people who pay into society the most.
Lets have labour back in, and bankrupt the country again.
Labour didn't leave the country in deficit - Northern Rock did - Labour bailed them out - at the time of the beginning of the bail-out, The country was not in deficit - in fact it was the opposite - then Northern Rock ****ed everything up and Labour ensure that the wealthy and non-wealthy people that banked with them were still entitled to their money - if Labour hadn't done this then the deficit would be far less but the people who had their houses/savings etc through Northern Rock would be homeless and skint. What would you rather a government did? Leave people to lose their homes or bail them out by borrowing money? The tories would've done EXACTLY the same but their excuse would've been that they did it to save people. It's a commonly misrepresented fact by the Tories
Sturgeon and Salmond may be astute and practised politicians, but neither have kids (no stake in the future, Salmond married somebody old enough to be his mother, would he get on with Rooney?) they only care for themselves and wish to be King and Queen
True & then they sold it to their chum Branson for a couple of quid.Labour didn't leave the country in deficit - Northern Rock did - Labour bailed them out - at the time of the beginning of the bail-out, The country was not in deficit - in fact it was the opposite - then Northern Rock ****ed everything up and Labour ensure that the wealthy and non-wealthy people that banked with them were still entitled to their money - if Labour hadn't done this then the deficit would be far less but the people who had their houses/savings etc through Northern Rock would be homeless and skint. What would you rather a government did? Leave people to lose their homes or bail them out by borrowing money? The tories would've done EXACTLY the same but their excuse would've been that they did it to save people. It's a commonly misrepresented fact by the Tories
No - they're politicians, they never tell liesAre you suggesting that the Tories (or Cons as they are sometimes, appropriately, known) tell fibs, Marcus![]()

Are you suggesting that the Tories (or Cons as they are sometimes, appropriately, known) tell fibs, Marcus![]()
True & then they sold it to their chum Branson for a couple of quid.