Blimey, this notion that Allam is just a poor old businessman who really shouldn't be getting all of this awful abuse is just a tad wearing. Cogent arguments, respectfully put have been the hallmarks of the anti-Hull Tigers campaign (unlike Allams' inflammatory and provocative statements about any opposition to his plans). Even at Palace, when a sizeable portion of the fans were finally seen to have turned against Allam's ownership (as opposed to just his Hull Tigers plans), it was hardly Baltimore..a few banners with nothing more inflammatory than 'Allam Out' written on them, and a few chants (none of which were personally abusive that I could hear).
I presume you remember the Fish/Dolan campaign?-- now that was vicious hatred.
I would like to know what you think those who profoundly disagree with Allam's plans are allowed to do.....just stay silent or stay away I suppose?