There seems to have been a lot of money around for Estidkhaar for the 2000 Guineas after his Greenham Stakes 2nd, he's top priced 8/1. For some reason everyone seems to think he is a better horse than the winner Muhaarar who's is as big as 20/1 for the classic.
I'm struggling to understand why though, as having watched the race a few times I think the best horse won. Muhaarar also fell out of the gate losing abit of ground on the field, yet was still able to win. And he had Estidkhaar well held at the line.
On pedigree aswell, Estidkhaar looks very doubtful to stay the mile, 7 furlongs looks about his optimum. Whilst Muhaarar should improve for the extra furlong.
I'm not saying I fancy either for the Guineas at this stage, but of the 2 Muharaar looks the better, so I fail to see why so many are backing Estidkhaar instead of him.
Il go as far as to say if both line up in the Guineas, Muharaar will confirm the Greenham form with him.
I'm struggling to understand why though, as having watched the race a few times I think the best horse won. Muhaarar also fell out of the gate losing abit of ground on the field, yet was still able to win. And he had Estidkhaar well held at the line.
On pedigree aswell, Estidkhaar looks very doubtful to stay the mile, 7 furlongs looks about his optimum. Whilst Muhaarar should improve for the extra furlong.
I'm not saying I fancy either for the Guineas at this stage, but of the 2 Muharaar looks the better, so I fail to see why so many are backing Estidkhaar instead of him.
Il go as far as to say if both line up in the Guineas, Muharaar will confirm the Greenham form with him.

