Off Topic Great Britain General Election May 7th 2015.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
The only point that I would disagree with you is that I believe the 7/7 bombings were an act of terror. IDK why AFC has taken such issue with your post on the subject though, there was nothing offensive or disrespectful in them.


I hear you.
They were an act of terror, the disagreement between you and I is who perpetrated the act. That has no bearing of the outcome of the act.
 
The only point that I would disagree with you is that I believe the 7/7 bombings were an act of terror. IDK why AFC has taken such issue with your post on the subject though, there was nothing offensive or disrespectful in them.

and by perpetrating I don't mean who carried the devices on, I mean who set them up and gave them everything they needed.

The 90s WTC bombing, the terrorists were given the ****ing bomb by the FBI. That is not even denied btw. Reporters even heard them(FBI agents) saying that not enough people were killed. I **** you not
 
No Lib Dem on the stage. Not much hoo-ha been made about that unlike Cameron's absence. Too big for their boots that lot. Completely compromised their historical ideals and principles to a large degree by getting into bed with the Tories which makes voting for them untenable. They need to get Clegg and people like Danny Alexander out. Clegg had potential but nailed his colours after the last election so is damaged goods now. For the last four years he's shown that he values status, power and the stage more than actual politics.

Seems like all the parties apart from Labour (being the main opposition and only real party who can win outright) are positioning themselves in the traditional Lib Dem spot here, i.e as 'alternatives' to the big two.
 
and by perpetrating I don't mean who carried the devices on, I mean who set them up and gave them everything they needed.

The 90s WTC bombing, the terrorists were given the ****ing bomb by the FBI. That is not even denied btw. Reporters even heard them(FBI agents) saying that not enough people were killed. I **** you not

The fact that the government allowed a flight with the Bin Laden family on leave the country shortly after 9/11 is proof enough that the Bush & Bin Laden family were quite close and that there's more to the bombings/hijacking than meets the eye.
 
I'm ducking out of this thread until later as I'm not somewhere I can watch the debate so will be watching it on I player later!
 
The fact that the government allowed a flight with the Bin Laden family on leave the country shortly after 9/11 is proof enough that the Bush & Bin Laden family were quite close and that there's more to the bombings/hijacking than meets the eye.
That was about the US relationship with the Saudis and not an indicator that there was some form of mad conspiracy at play
 
That was about the US relationship with the Saudis and not an indicator that there was some form of mad conspiracy at play

True that alone can't be an indicator, though most of the "terrorists" were saudis. Yet they invaded Iraq?

The Saudis also told Blair and I quote " If you don;t call off that investigation into weapons deals between the UK and us saudis we cannot promise there will not be another 7\7 bombing"

I really don;t and never have got into 7\7 because it may be a touchy subject with you all which is understandable but, the guys that did it, were patsies.

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th The top man in this company, a former anti terrorism officer for Scotland Yard.

Also Mohammad Sidique Khan, the teacher who killed himself and six others in the Edgware Road bombing, attended Parliament as the guest of a Labour MP. He was invited in July 2004 by Jon Trickett MP in his capacity as a learning mentor at Hillside Primary School in Beeston, Leeds where Mr Tickett's wife Sarah is headteacher

ON 7/7 IT WAS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE 'SUPPOSED' LONDON BOMBERS TO BE FILMED AT 7.22 AM AT LUTON STATION AND ALSO CATCH A TRAIN WHICH ARRIVED AT KINGS CROSS PRIOR TO BEING FILMED AT 8.26 AM

Duplicate ID cards found at different sites.


Now, with just those four weird circumstances imo that is enough reason to question things if one wants to. I think it merits further examination, but not here not now for obvious reasons.

I have my reasons for believing 9\11 and 7\7, which were terrorism attacks, were not carried out by the groups claimed.

Oh and the wtiness accounts that were ignored
American student Sean Baran was walking towards Edgware Road Station when the explosion occurred. "One gentleman told me that the floor of the train he was on was blown out, it was just gone," he said. [Sky News]
Bruce Lait, in a tube carriage in which an explosion occurred:

As they made their way out, a policeman pointed out where the bomb had been. "The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag,

one bomb was "under" the train, not in it. A bomb in the carriage, all the energy would have went up and out, mainly through the windows, not down through the floor.

I have to add this too

The London Police claim the bombers were photographed at the Luton station, then rode the 7:40 train to King's Cross, where they were photographed again.


But according to the actual train timetable, the 7:40 train was cancelled that day and even had it not been cancelled, would not have arrived in time for the men to be photographed at King's Cross at 8:26.


Why is no one taking this up? obvious lies from the authorities.

because like 9\11, it is not cool to question it, an emotional suppression of discussion which is very effective at preventing asking questions, which should not be a bad thing at all, the families of those killed have a right to know what really happened
 
Last edited:
That was about the US relationship with the Saudis and not an indicator that there was some form of mad conspiracy at play

When you look how close the Bush family was with the Bin Laden family you don't find that suspicious at all? I don't really spend any time discussing or looking into it because I don't care enough and I don't think we'll ever find out either way but from the little I've heard/read about it, something just doesn't feel right about the whole thing. And I don't think I'd ever put anything past the American government, they are a collection of the most shady ****ers on the planet who would do anything for $$$$
 
Status
Not open for further replies.