I literally don't know where to begin but i'll have a stab.
It's not taking money from the Rich, they get ill too you know, same as the poor. Statistics have shown the poor live shorter lives so they are less of a drain, except when they are getting free Methadone because we know the unemployed are all probably addicts.
You contradicted yourself in the same sentence, that takes a special skill, besides plenty of people were too busy working hard to be able to go to Uni, plenty of people worked hard at Uni, but no harder than people actually doing the hard graft, the ****ty jobs.You know, the working classes? Of course plenty of people can't go to Uni because they can't afford it, anyone who argues to the contrary has no grasp of reality.
How many Members of the current batch of Tory, or Labour Mps do you think went to a Public School? There are huge benefits to attending a public school, the more expensive the better, that's not even an argument. The Vast majority of people who went Public will rise to the top, ususally despite their many flaws.
Why on earth would you think Rich people spend more on ***s? Its bizzarre. Are their ***s made of gold or something, or is it because they have more leisure time to smoke?
What planet are you living on that you think if you think the plebs are all firing about in clapped out Puntos and the Toffs in 80k motors? Are you for ****ing real?
You should copy and paste this and send it to the Daily Mail, this is a masterclass in Class stereotyping. I consider myself a bit right wing, but you make me look like Che Guevara.

Shergar, don't listen to Dev, as I said, he is not well, he would start an argument in an empty house and still lose.

Exactly mate, I work in finance and I wouldn't say I'm the smartest guy in the world, but, far smarter than him, Go easy on him though, bullying isn't niceHe certainly talks some rubbish, thinking poor people spend more on luxurys than the wealthy![]()

You my friend are a walking, talking Orwellian nightmare.The rich do not use the NHS, so how can they be a drain on it because they live longer? Anyone with any money would not put themselves at all sorts of risk by even setting foot in an NHS hospital, never mind having any treatment in there.
Whilst private schools may well be slightly better, I don't agree that you can't get a good education elsewhere. Part of the reason why the private schools get better grades is due to the class of child that is sent their. People who can afford to send there children to private schools are usually successful intelligent people, and this is a trait they will pass on to their offspring.
I bet if you swapped round the generations of kids and sent the kids from the successful wealthy family's to the public schools and sent the kids from unsuccessful family's to the private schools, the kids from the wealthy successful family's would still get the better grades.
This has been proven as public schools in wealthier more successful areas often beat the grades of private schools. So it is not a case of wether the schools are private or public, it's a case of the genetic intelligence of the children they get through their doors.
If one child's parents are both doctors, then it is highly likely that that child is going to be very intelligent. Whilst if another child's parents are both cleaners, then the chances of that child being intelligent are very slim.
I have already explained the reasons behind wealthy people spending more on cigarettes, alcohol and fuel, so I'm not going to keep repeating myself. It should be glaringly obviously why they spend more on those things![]()

The rich do not use the NHS, so how can they be a drain on it because they live longer? Anyone with any money would not put themselves at all sorts of risk by even setting foot in an NHS hospital, never mind having any treatment in there.
Whilst private schools may well be slightly better, I don't agree that you can't get a good education elsewhere. Part of the reason why the private schools get better grades is due to the class of child that is sent their. People who can afford to send there children to private schools are usually successful intelligent people, and this is a trait they will pass on to their offspring.
I bet if you swapped round the generations of kids and sent the kids from the successful wealthy family's to the public schools and sent the kids from unsuccessful family's to the private schools, the kids from the wealthy successful family's would still get the better grades.
This has been proven as public schools in wealthier more successful areas often beat the grades of private schools. So it is not a case of wether the schools are private or public, it's a case of the genetic intelligence of the children they get through their doors.
If one child's parents are both doctors, then it is highly likely that that child is going to be very intelligent. Whilst if another child's parents are both cleaners, then the chances of that child being intelligent are very slim.
I have already explained the reasons behind wealthy people spending more on cigarettes, alcohol and fuel, so I'm not going to keep repeating myself. It should be glaringly obviously why they spend more on those things![]()
^^^^You are nearly as stupid as Aldo. I'm with Jip now, you're definitely Irish.
The rich do not use the NHS, so how can they be a drain on it because they live longer? Anyone with any money would not put themselves at all sorts of risk by even setting foot in an NHS hospital, never mind having any treatment in there.
Whilst private schools may well be slightly better, I don't agree that you can't get a good education elsewhere. Part of the reason why the private schools get better grades is due to the class of child that is sent their. People who can afford to send there children to private schools are usually successful intelligent people, and this is a trait they will pass on to their offspring.
I bet if you swapped round the generations of kids and sent the kids from the successful wealthy family's to the public schools and sent the kids from unsuccessful family's to the private schools, the kids from the wealthy successful family's would still get the better grades.
This has been proven as public schools in wealthier more successful areas often beat the grades of private schools. So it is not a case of wether the schools are private or public, it's a case of the genetic intelligence of the children they get through their doors.
If one child's parents are both doctors, then it is highly likely that that child is going to be very intelligent. Whilst if another child's parents are both cleaners, then the chances of that child being intelligent are very slim.
I have already explained the reasons behind wealthy people spending more on cigarettes, alcohol and fuel, so I'm not going to keep repeating myself. It should be glaringly obviously why they spend more on those things![]()
He isn't saying that, but I amAll rich people = Clever and hard working
All poor people - Stupid and lazy
In summary that's what you are saying.
He isn't saying that, but I am

Poor people are generally stupid and by **** they are ugly too.He is saying that, he's also saying the NHS is Communism![]()
Poor people are generally stupid and by **** they are ugly too.
It is true though, people with money are better looking, hence I am one handsome bastardHe missed that part out but i'm sure he'll go down that route if pushed.
It is true though, people with money are better looking, hence I am one handsome bastard
I would start and finish by licking their arseholesYou must log in or register to see images