Off Topic mafia 5: game thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll change my vote to gerrez

I think he needs to be in the mix and no movement is happening at the moment
 
How does creating a tie help? Sorry new to your version ofthe game. <ok>


You guys got any ideas?

This tends to be the way things go on this board (and the fact Gerrez is always up for suspicion then avoids It last minute <whistle>)

Interesting to see how you and the other Newkie lads would approach this and if you have any other ideas that haven't been mentioned yet.
 
Well if we suggest a tie and someone tries to alter the voting to keep someone out it gives us clues as to patterns between people.
Ok cheers <ok>


Think I need to read over everything again to get a better sense of any specific views.
 
I'm tempted to change my vote to IBWT, something doesn't smell right with him.

Talks tactics and is a pool fan..... However, i think for now its probably better to get rid of the quiet ones mainly just to make this game more interesting. Can't have people not contributing or talking or not involved whatsoever...
 
So is afcfw the ONLY known innocent?
If we don't know about anyone else (and I'm not trusting any general pleas of "I'm innocent !") the how do we vote?

The masons will know that each other is innocent too. I think.....but since we, and more importantly, AFC, dont know who the masons are yet, AFC cannot rule them out of his enquiry, unless they come forward, which would not be advised at this early stage.
 
afcftw, what should I change my vote to? If at all. I will vote for whoever you see fit.
 
You guys got any ideas?

This tends to be the way things go on this board (and the fact Gerrez is always up for suspicion then avoids It last minute <whistle>)

Interesting to see how you and the other Newkie lads would approach this and if you have any other ideas that haven't been mentioned yet.
On ours everyone was trigger happy with random 'reasons' to accuse. More of a blood bath with lots of innocents killed. You lot seem to think it through more. <laugh>
 
I'm tempted to change my vote to IBWT, something doesn't smell right with him.

Talks tactics and is a pool fan..... However, i think for now its probably better to get rid of the quiet ones mainly just to make this game more interesting. Can't have people not contributing or talking or not involved whatsoever...

I've been working in a hot office all day.... not my fault if I smell a little <grr>
 
On ours everyone was trigger happy with random 'reasons' to accuse. More of a blood bath with lots of innocents killed. You lot seem to think it through more. <laugh>


Sounds like our first couple of games to be fair <laugh>

Plenty of lynching people because of their name and not the game <whistle>
 
I've been working in a hot office all day.... not my fault if I smell a little <grr>

Are you sure its because you haven't been to busy walking into all those Pizza shops and racketeering our lovely townsman :emoticon-0132-envy:

Who hasn't said anything at all this thread and is playing?
 
Are you sure its because you haven't been to busy walking into all those Pizza shops and racketeering our lovely townsman :emoticon-0132-envy:

Who hasn't said anything at all this thread and is playing?

I was thinking of ordering a dominos tonight but thought that might look a bit suspicious :bandit:


From what I can see, Magic hasn't said anything... RHC has come on voted Swarbs then changed and that's about it. Valley has said 1 or 2 things and might be catching up and Nozzer came on early, voted me and hasn't been seen since...
 
Oh and GoonerCym hasn't said anything but has definitely been online apparently.
 
Well if we suggest a tie and someone tries to alter the voting to keep someone out it gives us clues as to patterns between people.
Soooooo if we vote to make it a tie is it possible that we inadvertently pull in a fellow townie and get them lynched? Not only that but would then be up for suspicion due to voting for them hence potentially losing 2?

Alternatively not voting at all is deemed suspicious so it's all a gamble. Is that right or have I misread? <laugh>
 
7:15pm table:

IBWT - 1 vote - by Nozzer

No Lynch - 3 vote - by bobbyD, Danilo, RHC

Gerrez -1 vote- by AFCFTW

Danilo -1 vote- Swarbs

BobbyD - 2 vote- by Astro, Real Morgan

Astro - 1 vote - by IBWT

Billy - 1 vote - by Gerrez

Less hope than neville - 1 vote – by Bodanki

Goonercymraeg - 2 vote – by mikey, real mrgan freeman



no votes:

Bodanki

RHC

AFCFTW

mikey

magic

Gerrez

Nozzer

Valley

Obi wan

real morgan freeman

Swarbs
 
afcftw, what should I change my vote to? If at all. I will vote for whoever you see fit.

Just pick someone from his four, just following an ordered vote from the proven town isn't that helpful as it's an easy way for mafia to just follow the crowd and blend in, picking from a selection at least keeps it to an approved list whilst showing people's patterns and motives in who they actually pick.
 
On ours everyone was trigger happy with random 'reasons' to accuse. More of a blood bath with lots of innocents killed. You lot seem to think it through more. <laugh>

True but we also had to suffer Less Than's one page diatribe and JPF's random rule changes. <laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.