Just put a lasting link to NBCS's The Southampton Way documentary in the Newbie's Guide just in case there is a person who hasn't seen it yet or wishes to see it again. If anyone asks about it you can tell them where to go..!
UK Government rejects immunity for child sex abuse whisteblowers http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5...-to-lift-official-secrets-act-for-csa-scandal ****ing disgusting. Here is a list of what MP's voted yes or no. http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5530/how-mps-voted-on-move-to-change-official-secrets-act-over-csa You notice Conservatives and the Lib Dems are the ones voting no. The Government claim they want to find all the *****s and sexual abuse within politics, yet vote against the very rule that would make people come forward with evidence. This **** pisses me off. No way am I voting Con's or Lib's.
Interesting post that Beefy. I'll read that in a minute. I did come here with my own news item which should make a few people sit up and take notice: None other than Airbus have applied for a patent to produce an energy source for the transportation sector [I'll have a wild guess that'll be an aircraft engine] using an exothermic reaction: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/ We are getting step by step closer to solving the problems with cheap and clean energy. After NASA and a list of other companies, some well known, some not so, come out to back LENR, now comes Airbus. They said it defies the laws of nuclear physics, and is impossible, but it appears that the heretics are about clear their throats ready to get the last word.
So let me get this right. Those majority of MPs have voted that people cannot come forward with historical evidence or testament that could uncover a potential *****phile or child abuser because the suspect could be covered by the Official Secrets Act [cue shut down of forum]..? I haven't misunderstood that..?
Basically it means say a person comes forward with info about a MP or some one else in the Government is a child abuser or *****. They themselves could get taken to court etc because of the OSA. So no one will now come forward as they will worry that they could get locked up as well.
Ok, yeah I read that bit too. So not only does the OSA indirectly cover the suspect, but it also potentially prosecutes the person with information, all for the purpose of national security. F*** me, it is said our country is one of the most secret in terms of covering its people in authority. Open Govt..? Having a f***ing laugh.
Terrible link but: http://cricfree.tv/watch/live/san-jose-earthquakes-vs-chicago-fire-live-streaming Guly Do Prado awaits you..! Actually, it's not that bad. The link that is. The standard of football isn't impressive. Guly featured quite a bit.
http://cricfree.sx/watch/live/san-jose-earthquakes-vs-chicago-fire-live-streaming Quick! Chicago are 2-1 down in San Jose's first game at their new stadium... 10 minutes left, Guly on as a sub.
I was one of the last to see it...only a couple of weeks ago. Can I just add that you shouldn't be put off by thinking it will be full of American style reporting with stupid errors...an excellent programme (mainly because it is so positive about Saints).
Um yes it does. Mann told Exaro "peoples biggest concern about whistleblowing is being prosecuted under ther OSA" So the OSA is stopping people coming forward about peados etc. This vote was to make whistleblowers immune to the OSA but Con's and the Lib Dem's voted against.
I can't see mine on there (unless I am blind) So basically he wanted to vote no but didn't want to get found out.
Appalling, but expected. Mine (Mark Hoban - Tory) voted no. I expect nothing less from the Conservatives or their puppets in government (LibDems). I hope this government gets booted out, and that a few of them lose their seats - Clegg, and Danny Alexander in particular.
