Basically it means say a person comes forward with info about a MP or some one else in the Government is a child abuser or *****. They themselves could get taken to court etc because of the OSA. So no one will now come forward as they will worry that they could get locked up as well.So let me get this right. Those majority of MPs have voted that people cannot come forward with historical evidence or testament that could uncover a potential *****phile or child abuser because the suspect could be covered by the Official Secrets Act [cue shut down of forum]..?
I haven't misunderstood that..?
Basically it means say a person comes forward with info about a MP or some one else in the Government is a child abuser or *****. They themselves could get taken to court etc because of the OSA. So no one will now come forward as they worry that they could get locked up as well.
Watching some MLS.
You must log in or register to see images
![]()
http://cricfree.sx/watch/live/san-jose-earthquakes-vs-chicago-fire-live-streamingNow that could stand its own thread. Link..!![]()
UK Government rejects immunity for child sex abuse whisteblowers
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5...-to-lift-official-secrets-act-for-csa-scandal
****ing disgusting.
Just put a lasting link to NBCS's The Southampton Way documentary in the Newbie's Guide just in case there is a person who hasn't seen it yet or wishes to see it again. If anyone asks about it you can tell them where to go..!
I'm very pleased that my own MP, Lib Dem Tessa Munt, voted Aye (against her own party line).UK Government rejects immunity for child sex abuse whisteblowers
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5...-to-lift-official-secrets-act-for-csa-scandal
****ing disgusting.
Here is a list of what MP's voted yes or no.
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5530/how-mps-voted-on-move-to-change-official-secrets-act-over-csa
You notice Conservatives and the Lib Dems are the ones voting no.
The Government claim they want to find all the *****s and sexual abuse within politics, yet vote against the very rule that would make people come forward with evidence.
This **** pisses me off. No way am I voting Con's or Lib's.
Um yes it does.That's... not really what the article says.
I can't see mine on there (unless I am blind) So basically he wanted to vote no but didn't want to get found out.I'm very pleased that my own MP, Lib Dem Tessa Munt, voted Aye (against her own party line).
UK Government rejects immunity for child sex abuse whisteblowers
You notice Conservatives and the Lib Dems are the ones voting no.
The Government claim they want to find all the *****s and sexual abuse within politics, yet vote against the very rule that would make people come forward with evidence.
This **** pisses me off. No way am I voting Con's or Lib's.
I'm very pleased that my own MP, Lib Dem Tessa Munt, voted Aye (against her own party line).