50 points against the weakest P.L. sides in decades,should be an absolute minimum.

Without him as frustrating as he is there would have been no win at Southampton or Man utd. Have to take the rough with the good.It's not 'hate' it's frustration. Without the occasional wonder pass or hopeful bast that hits the target he's a liability.
He was all over the pitch, often no where useful, which puts stress on others to cover (unless his 'roaming' sty;e has been agreed), he waves his arms about instead of organising himself and he gives the ball away very cheaply.
I only watched the highlights back on sky last night and have to say it was one boring game. But, credit where credit is due we dug in and battled out a good win and another clean sheet away from home.
I think we got lucky with Taylor late on and a definite penalty, why does he have to do that which could have cot us a great win. Gomis what can I say again from the highlights was very poor again. what did he do with that 1 on 1, no composure just swung a leg at it and put it in row z. Good flick on for the goal, but someone said earlier on this thread, he is a better defender than attacker.
Great 3 points though and another season in the top flight. I just hope we go on and secure more points than we ever had in the past and don't let our season fizzle out in to a damp squib.
Without him as frustrating as he is there would have been no win at Southampton or Man utd. Have to take the rough with the good.
Or, with a quality player in his place we wouldn't have had to rely on hit and hope football.
Shakes both ways.

I find it staggering that you will cut a centre forward slack who cant score goals is £80,000 a week but persist with your anti Shelvey thing when he has won us games. Shelvey isn't the best I accept, but he has certainly delivered more points than a certain CF who cant even hit the target when through 1 on 1. He couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo.Only watched on TV (live) Gomis made a few errors but was busy all game - US pundits thought he was 'excellent' with 'if your striker is going to score the team has to deliver the chances' (which I interpreted as he didn't get much service). I think he'll continue like that TBH - making goals or spec for others with scoring many himself.
I find it staggering that you will cut a centre forward slack who cant score goals is £80,000 a week but persist with your anti Shelvey thing when he has won us games. Shelvey isn't the best I accept, but he has certainly delivered more points than a certain CF who cant even hit the target when through 1 on 1. He couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo.
I must admit, you are a true visionary, Vetch. A couple of weeks ago, you were saying we wouldn't be in 9th place for much longer....and you were right. We are now 8th.![]()

Shelvey has scored 2 - Gomis 5 But that's by the by. Gomis has created space for others and that's part of his game too.
Shelvey got lucky v Southampton, Gomis v Man U. Honours even..
Seems to me that if the deflection is off a defender, they credit the goal to the "attacker", but if the deflection is off one of your own attacking team, then the "deflector" gets the goal!I personally see it as Shelvey 3, Gomis 4 as I still cannot fathom how they can give the goal to Gomis when he was ducking out of the way. Deflections happen all the time. I mean Rosicky has been credited with Arsenal's second goal. Did they not see the bloody huge deflection by the Everton defender that took it away from the keeper, should that not be an own goal if Gomis is credited with the Shelvey shot?

Sad that you,an intelligent poster, has chosen to follow the sheep.
Why not wait until the end of the season before gloating?
I'm not sure I ever described myself as "a true visionary",perhaps you could reproduce the post where I made such an arrogant assertion take your pick.
You have seemingly morphed into a new Valley,by making things up as you go along, just to suit your cause/case, and where did that happen, specifics please wibble, no accusations but a fact or two.
Shame on you for that,aswan,
Yesterday's League Cup Final brought back such great memories of the Laudrup days. 8 wins, 18 losses in the 46 games and sacked. Yes, I think most remember how inept we were both on and off the field
But I'm sure you don't remember them,since Monkees have short memories. I think you mean elephants wibble
Glorious flowing football, we looked good in defeat,admiration from all around the world,etc, we still have it etc.
Now what do we have to endure/look forward to? Dross,with a handful of extra points thrown in to appease the Monk groupies, and irk you and your luvvies wibble, and long may it continue.
Oh,and not a Cup on the horizon.but another year in the premiership is, qualification for Europe by rite is, highest place in the prem is, most points in the prem is,


Seems to me that if the deflection is off a defender, they credit the goal to the "attacker", but if the deflection is off one of your own attacking team, then the "deflector" gets the goal!![]()
I personally see it as Shelvey 3, Gomis 4 as I still cannot fathom how they can give the goal to Gomis when he was ducking out of the way. Deflections happen all the time. I mean Rosicky has been credited with Arsenal's second goal. Did they not see the bloody huge deflection by the Everton defender that took it away from the keeper, should that not be an own goal if Gomis is credited with the Shelvey shot?