Can they do that for just contesting it? I thought that was for frivolous appeals?
It is a frivolous appeal.
Can they do that for just contesting it? I thought that was for frivolous appeals?
Is it a calculated risk so he gets to play against city before the appeal is heard?
Especially since Cahill got away with stamping on Kane at WHLGary Cahill defends Chelsea team-mate's approach
"One of his attributes, as well as his skills and scoring fantastic goals, is that he puts his foot in."
I hope Cahill is representing Costa at the appeal![]()

It's not an appeal as he's not been found guilty yet!It is a frivolous appeal.
There's no ban been issued yet.No, he will miss City unless the ban is overturned (which has never happened in FA history)
There's no way he'll get away with it, he's toast.If Oliver says he'd have sent him off after reviewing it on replay. Can't see how the FA can overrule that but we'll soon find out if they will anyway.
So it's Costa's Oliver twist performance v Video evidence and the ref's call
It's not an appeal ffs!When does an appeal become frivolous? Everyone man and his dog knows he was going to be banned for this, if there was ever a case for adding an additional game on then this is surely it.
It's not an appeal ffs!
If he'd have been sent off and given a 3 match ban as a result it'd be an appeal, which could be deemed frivolous
In this case he's been charged after the fact and he's contesting the charge instead of merely accepting it
It's not just semantics though, is it?Oh look ok a pissing contest over semantics.....
How exciting and unexpected of the residents of this board......

It's no more pointless an endeavour than say, suggesting starting line-ups and tactics, when nothing we discuss is going to influence the future.I really think if you all want to spend your time arguing over if it's an appeal or a contesting of a charge fair enough...
Honestly who gives a bollocks lfc are out and that's all that matters to me, I could care less if Costa gets a ban or gets away with it