Bony to City for 30 million

[Matth_2014]

And people had a go at us for '' overpaying'' for Shaw as well.

 

[chelsea - over 100 years of history]

You did over pay for Shaw though...

And good strikers are always worth a lot more than left backs, especially mid season.

 

[HRH Custard VC]

This belongs in the rival thread, or make a You tube video about it

 

[HRH Custard VC]

You did over pay for Shaw though...

And good strikers are always worth a lot more than left backs, especially mid season.

Like £50M

 

[Stan]

You did over pay for Shaw though...

And good strikers are always worth a lot more than left backs, especially mid season.

Although he won't be available until Feb...!

 

[Stan]

Like £50M

I think he went on to prove that he was actually worth minus! Chelsea would have had to pay AC to "sign" Torres so he could be loaned to Atletico Madrid! If not what was in it for AC?!

 

[Matth_2014]

You did over pay for Shaw though...

And good strikers are always worth a lot more than left backs, especially mid season.

Difference is Shaw is younger than Bony though.

 

[Blueman]

Get your point with Torres. Still overpaid for Shaw though.

 

[King Shergar]

Bony is a good player, 30 million seems a fair price nowadays

 

[Style]

Get your point with Torres. Still overpaid for Shaw though.

Maybe we did but I don't think Southampton would have sold him for less and he might turn out to be worth a lot more than we paid. Has the potential.

 

[ValleyGraduate12]

Difference is Shaw is younger than Bony though.

But he's crap whereas Bony was the top scoring player in the PL in 2014. I know you're pissed you look like Jonjo but be quiet child

 

[Blueman]

[QUO"Style, post: 7464788, member: 1012234"]Maybe we did but I don't think Southampton would have sold him for less and he might turn out to be worth a lot more than we paid. Has the potential.[/QUOTE]
The potential to be worth more than 30m? Don't think so.

 

[UnitedinRed]

[QUO"Style, post: 7464788, member: 1012234"]Maybe we did but I don't think Southampton would have sold him for less and he might turn out to be worth a lot more than we paid. Has the potential.
The potential to be worth more than 30m? Don't think so.

Could you please learn to use the quote function correctly?

Also he certainly does have the potential to be worth £30million. He wouldnt be the first former saints left back to do just that

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Difference is Shaw is younger than Bony though.

My cousin is 18 years younger than Shaw so is worth £100m

Given what inferior strikers go for, £30m is a good deal for City. £30m for a left-back with barely a year's experience is/was far more of a gamble.

 

[Paulpowersleftfoot]

And people had a go at us for '' overpaying'' for Shaw as well.

£30m for an obese injury prone left back is overpaying
£30m for a proven PL striker is far less of a gamble

 

[Treble]

Both are over priced. Both are a gamble. Both will probably end up not living up to the price tag. The end.

 

[Daveunited]

£30m for an obese injury prone left back is overpaying
£30m for a proven PL striker is far less of a gamble

LVG never called Shaw "fat" and he cost £27m

 

[Diego]

LVG never called Shaw "fat" and he cost £27m

Forget it Dave, some people just equate unfit/fit to fat/thin

 

[Matth_2014]

£30m for an obese injury prone left back is overpaying
£30m for a proven PL striker is far less of a gamble

.

 

[weararedbonnet]

What on earth does this have to do with United Matth? It's pointless, has **** all to do with United, so why not post it on the ££ity board?