There was a Man City fan on TalkSport yesterday claiming Mangala is a better PL CB than John Terry![]()
You must log in or register to see images
There was a Man City fan on TalkSport yesterday claiming Mangala is a better PL CB than John Terry![]()

They were talking about how good John Terry has been and currently is. They claimed he would still walk into any other PL clubs first team.
I can't think of a good argument against this tbh. I think it shows how bad this league is at defending![]()
exactly..... thats why Chelsea are not truly rock solid, there is no carvalho to cover terry.
At the very top there is a different standard to be judged but but is inconcienet for uir to judge utd players by it... he can give it large but then its all... oh poor us look at all our injuries (arseal have had more) and so forth.
Tobes:7421756 said:They were talking about how good John Terry has been and currently is. They claimed he would still walk into any other PL clubs first team.
I can't think of a good argument against this tbh. I think it shows how bad this league is at defending![]()
Terry is having an Indian summer under Mourinho, but he's being made to look better by the fantastic covering of Matic mind.....
There was a Man City fan on TalkSport yesterday claiming Mangala is a better PL CB than John Terry![]()
They were talking about how good John Terry has been and currently is. They claimed he would still walk into any other PL clubs first team.
I can't think of a good argument against this tbh. I think it shows how bad this league is at defending![]()
Terry is having an Indian summer under Mourinho, but he's being made to look better by the fantastic covering of Matic mind.....
Terry is being carried largely by Matic. Hes single handedly carrying a few tbh in defensive terms.
Ive said the standard of defending is very poor compared yo a few years ago. Teams have let those standards slip by concentrating on attack.
The key thing is to have a solid defensive midfielder. Which chelsea do have, city have and United have (carrick and blind).
Saints have one too.
Forget Terry, what's really telling is how much Cahill is being washed along on this tide of plaudits for Chelsea's defence which is result of not just Matic in front but Ivanovic and Azpec who are head and shoulders above both CBs imo.
Having said that, take away a good defensive midfielder from in front of any CB and he will suffer so isn't the presence of Matic no different to any good team with good CBs. In that sense Terry still proves his worth regardless.
Kompany on the other hand I think is overrated. His biggest weakness is his positional play and it's not a minor problem, it's constant. As such there's always a mistake waiting to happen or an opportunity for a striker to get a run on him.
Forget Terry, what's really telling is how much Cahill is being washed along on this tide of plaudits for Chelsea's defence which is result of not just Matic in front but Ivanovic and Azpec who are head and shoulders above both CBs imo.
Having said that, take away a good defensive midfielder from in front of any CB and he will suffer so isn't the presence of Matic no different to any good team with good CBs. In that sense Terry still proves his worth regardless.
Kompany on the other hand I think is overrated. His biggest weakness is his positional play and it's not a minor problem, it's constant. As such there's always a mistake waiting to happen or an opportunity for a striker to get a run on him.

Absolutely. Look at our team, we have s**t defensive midfielder in Gerrard and average one in lucas and making our cbs seem shocking! Although in fairness most of our cbs are shocking anyway![]()
We don't need fourth, we're going to win the Europa League instead![]()
Bodanki':7422650 said:We don't need fourth, we're going to win the Europa League instead![]()
I was saying to a mate earlier, whats the bet that the first season that winning the Europa League = CL qualification, an English side will win it.
We haven't had anywhere near enough Europa League/UEFA Cup winners in recent times, despite (imo atleast) our non top 4 clubs being the strongest in Europe. Its mainly because English teams could never be arsed with it......I been saying they should reward the EL winner with a CL place for years, far more incentive to win it.
Same.
Even better that it's not at the expense of the top four as well. Same for CL winners now too although if non top four English teams won both, fourth in the league would then miss out
I can't see that situation ever arising, where two teams outside the top 4 win the CL and EL respectively.
So we shouldn't ever get a repeat of the whole Spurs missing out fiasco, though I still go back to read that thread sometimes for a laugh.

Will be tough as the teams from La Liga outside the top4 are always strong (the likes of Sevilla and Valencia are ranked higher in Europe than Spurs and Everton etc)
And there is the biggest obstacle for Europa teams, the 8 rejects dropping out of the CL. Makes it very tough.
Assuming you're not one of said rejects![]()