O/T Another one for the conspiracy theorists.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Not exactly. There were problems with the official film of the Moon landing. Nobody knows whether this was because the quality was such that you couldn't tell what it was or (here the conspiracy theorists are having a ball) whether there were things on the film that were considered not for the public's eye.
The film commonly seen was shot in Stanley Kubrik's studio with Kubrik himself taking control (he did a deal with the 'powers-that-be' but nobody knows exactly what - there are documentaries on this subject readily available) of some scenes.
So yes, we did land on the Moon but most of the film was re-shot.

Do they allow to roam around unsupervised or to vote in Australia?
 
I have a way out, I'm ****ing off to TX in a year or so for good... it's you lot I feel sorry for.

Thats the most insulting and patronising thing I've ever read. **** you. If you choose your place of residence based on taxation then its your family and everyone who has ever met you that i feel sorry for.
 
I guess it's the "in" thing to blame our cousins over the pond for everything.
I have had more experience than most, dealing with Americans.
True, you get some backward thinking rednecks, but you also get that in any country. - Is it just a way to feel better about our own ****ty existance?

"we live in a very heavily taxed society"
"The government is playing Robin Hood, in reverse, steal from the poor and give to the rich"
"motorists are taxed to **** and yet we see no improvements on the state of the roads"
"the weather is ****"

well at least were not americans.

I know where I'd rather live.
TX has a VAT rate of 8%
most of US is under 10%
we have 20%

we're gonna lose the NHS soon. soon to be privatised.
I have a way out, I'm ****ing off to TX in a year or so for good... it's you lot I feel sorry for.

Why? We're coming with ya buddy (already slipped into the vernacular)
 
Thats the most insulting and patronising thing I've ever read. **** you. If you choose your place of residence based on taxation then its your family and everyone who has ever met you that i feel sorry for.

Those moments when two comedy figures' paths cross and they start arguing with each other: priceless.
 
Have a look here mate and then get back to me:

www.aulis.com/nasa4.htm

You must log in or register to see images


The flags in these two shots are suspiciously similar. For example, compare the shadows just back from the leading edge of the flag – and there are numerous other points of correspondence. (We will address the matter of the differential heights of the camera taking these images a little later.)

These side-by-side comparisons reveal the startling fact that BOTH flags are billowing positively towards the camera. But these two pictures were taken on opposite sides of the flag. When photographing the 'front' and the 'back' one flag should be billowing positively towards the camera while the other should be billowing negatively away from the camera.

In other words, the areas of the flag that are convex (towards) the camera in one image must be concave (away) in the other. But this was not the case during this Apollo photography.


I'm calling total bollocks on this analysis.

They clearly are taken taken from opposite sides of the flag. Just a bit of am optical illusion going on.

Look at the stripes next to the stars. Left pic the flag is almost folding over the stars towards us. Right pic the strips are misaligned, due to the flag folding away from us.

Some sad bastards that make their lifes work to try and disprove something like the moon landings. And this is the best they've got?
 
You must log in or register to see images


The flags in these two shots are suspiciously similar. For example, compare the shadows just back from the leading edge of the flag – and there are numerous other points of correspondence. (We will address the matter of the differential heights of the camera taking these images a little later.)

These side-by-side comparisons reveal the startling fact that BOTH flags are billowing positively towards the camera. But these two pictures were taken on opposite sides of the flag. When photographing the 'front' and the 'back' one flag should be billowing positively towards the camera while the other should be billowing negatively away from the camera.

In other words, the areas of the flag that are convex (towards) the camera in one image must be concave (away) in the other. But this was not the case during this Apollo photography.


I'm calling total bollocks on this analysis.

They clearly are taken taken from opposite sides of the flag. Just a bit of am optical illusion going on.

Look at the stripes next to the stars. Left pic the flag is almost folding over the stars towards us. Right pic the strips are misaligned, due to the flag folding away from us.

Some sad bastards that make their lifes work to try and disprove something like the moon landings. And this is the best they've got?

Yeah it's tosh. Didn't astronauts put mirrors up on the moon a while back, to do some sort of laser experiment? So somebody has been up there at least once.
 
Yeah it's tosh. Didn't astronauts put mirrors up on the moon a while back, to do some sort of laser experiment? So somebody has been up there at least once.

Mirrors on the landers which scince boffins bounce lasers off to measure the moons distance.

Also orbiting probes have now taken pictures of the landing sites. I'm sure some saddos out there have come up with an explanation on how they were faked...
 
I guess it's the "in" thing to blame our cousins over the pond for everything.
I have had more experience than most, dealing with Americans.
True, you get some backward thinking rednecks, but you also get that in any country. - Is it just a way to feel better about our own ****ty existance?

"we live in a very heavily taxed society"
"The government is playing Robin Hood, in reverse, steal from the poor and give to the rich"
"motorists are taxed to **** and yet we see no improvements on the state of the roads"
"the weather is ****"

well at least were not americans.

I know where I'd rather live.
TX has a VAT rate of 8%
most of US is under 10%
we have 20%

we're gonna lose the NHS soon. soon to be privatised.
I have a way out, I'm ****ing off to TX in a year or so for good... it's you lot I feel sorry for.

I don't blame them for much.

I just think they're the most ******ed nation on the planet.
 
not read the comments yet - but on that pic theres no depth or realistic defocusing

not sure till i read it what the claims are , but this is not a pic of a landing craft on Mars - if thats the claim
 
Each to his own but I believe the footage has been interwoven with studio footage. The questions are, what were the images that NASA didn't want us to see? Why have we never been back?
We are now getting 'doctored' images from the probe on Mars. Why?
Not a football message board subject but intriguing nevertheless.