I will,Lloris,and guess who want him,and not De Gea
No place for VDV at Spurs any more. Why have forwards who can control the ball, read the game, pass, shoot? A forward's job is to close down or, if you have the ball, to pass it sideways to bring someone else into play who can then pass sideways themselves so that eventually the ball can get to a fullback who can then pass to a centreback who can then pass it to Loris, thereby bringing our best player into the game.
Ability on the ball was very suspicious to AVB. It's why we sold Huddlestone - too much of a liability having people around who can play football when they're supposed to be running up blind alleys for 90 minutes.
(In truth I believe the stuff about his wife but it fits AVB's methodology to not fight hard to keep a quality footballer cos they can't run around as much as AVB'd like).
Zenit St. Petersburg P13 W10 D2 L1 F35 A9 GD26 Pts32
7 points clear of last season's winners. AVB can't be _that_ bad.
Quite aside from AVB's merits or lack of them, it's striking how much both he and Pochettino have struggled using similar systems with Spurs that seem to work better every other place they try them. I'm starting to think there's something in Spurs' DNA that wants to play a counterattacking 4-4-2.
We do have a longstanding history of signing apparently high quality players who under-achieve in practice.
Interesting discussion. I am completely convinced that we (and this applies to all clubs) sign and release far too many players based on the whim of the coach. If our midfield were Huddlestone, Livermore, Bentaleb, Mason and Carroll then we'd be just as good and about £30m better off.
And they'd all have had more game time, all have more experience and understanding of one another's games.
I really think the old "bird in the hand..." thing with transfers a lot. If you have a player and you know that they're even only competent at this level then really it needs to be a very good reason to go to the trouble of signing his replacement. A good majority of transfers are basically flops. But those players who, when you look, say, five years down the line, at their contribution/ability together with transfer fee and you think "decent signing" - they're really worth holding on to.
We often lose players before that 5 year period though. The vast majority of our signings are either plucked away after a year or two in the limelight by bigger/richer clubs, or they're flops. We rarely keep a player who performs consistently well for longer than 2 or 3 years.
I get why the extra pace means the squad should be larger but two signings a season would be fine with me if we've not lost a world class player.
We often lose players before that 5 year period though. The vast majority of our signings are either plucked away after a year or two in the limelight by bigger/richer clubs, or they're flops. We rarely keep a player who performs consistently well for longer than 2 or 3 years.
Oh yeah, sure. But even those who don't hang around for 5 years you can still make a judgement of whether they were a good purchase or not. I only mention 5 years cos it's good to have that circumspect judgement that you only get with time. It might take a while for us to realise that someone who was only here for one or two seasons was a good purchase overall.
Plus I want to say five years so that Khumalo still has a chance of being our best ever signing.
Thinking about Bale and King perhaps the kind of player we're after is someone who's clearly excellent but just injured a lot and therefore unable to play - that should keep the bigger clubs away. (I'm thinking about Bale's early career with us). It's when they get on the pitch and show how good they are that we start having problems (again - maybe this explains Khumalo. If he ever got a game Real Madrid would see how good he is and pluck him away from us.).
Since they're looking to get rid of Bale, surely they'd be tempted by a straight swap.