Scholes: Di Maria unhappy at United

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
CFC: Champs £launderx17

CFC: Champs £launderx17

Captain Ahab
Jan 2, 2012
19,665
3,401
113
Hammersmith
Scholes says LVG and Di M unhappy: he misses Madrid and regrets being forced out to Manchester.

"Louis van Gaal talks about progress. I expected United to have a better record by this stage of the season. Under David Moyes last season United had 17 points from their first 10 games. This time, having spent £150million in the summer, they have 13 points from 10 games.'
Scholes also says he has become worried about the apparent downbeat mood of the squad after their underwhelming start to the campaign, especially in the case of record signing Angel di Maria.
'My concern is that the mood among the United players feels a bit low-key,' he continued. 'Preparing for the broadcast of the game in Madrid this week, I watched re-runs of last season and Angel di Maria smiling broadly as he celebrated goal after goal with Cristiano Ronaldo.
'He doesn’t seem to be in the same happy mood at United. It feels downbeat among the team.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...is-van-Gaal-not-good-blasts-Paul-Scholes.html

Scholes added that the Dutch boss has appeared a completely different character to the man who led Holland to third place at the World Cup, and that it can be tricky at times to decipher his thought process during matches.
'It is difficult to figure out what Van Gaal is thinking during games,' explained Scholes. 'His demeanour doesn’t change throughout. He looks a bit subdued. Certainly, he appears very different to the man you saw on the touchline at the World Cup.'
 
Yeh. No.

Thats bollocks and scholes is well known amongst united fans to talk utter ****e.

Players look happier than in ages.
 
I think part of the problem with Di Maria is he isn't the big deal the Press tried to make him out to be.

Fair play, a decent player- but he isn't a superstar of the game... he's not a Falcao, for example. Anyone expecting him to be as prolific with the current United squad supporting him as he was for Real Madrid are going to be disappointed.
 
World class player playing among world class players won't be be able to play well. Interesting theory.
 
Shteve said:
You must be referring to his man of the match performance in the CL final.
Click to expand...

The reason Real lost La Liga last season was their performance in big games. They lost home and away to Barca, at home to Atletic and drew away.

Di Maria was hooked in all 4 games, one at half-time. Carlo identified this weakness in his side and got rid of it, Di Maria was desperate to prove himself but was forced out
 
I'd normally call bollocks considering that link but its a Man Utd paper :)
 
London's Only EC Winners said:
The reason Real lost La Liga last season was their performance in big games. They lost home and away to Barca, at home to Atletic and drew away.

Di Maria was hooked in all 4 games, one at half-time. Carlo identified this weakness in his side and got rid of it, Di Maria was desperate to prove himself but was forced out
Click to expand...

Why did Carlo play him in the CL final?
 
London's Only EC Winners said:
The reason Real lost La Liga last season was their performance in big games. They lost home and away to Barca, at home to Atletic and drew away.

Di Maria was hooked in all 4 games, one at half-time. Carlo identified this weakness in his side and got rid of it, Di Maria was desperate to prove himself but was forced out
Click to expand...

He identified it so well that he continued to play him in every big game including continuing to pick him for the games you've mentioned. Way to go Carlo <laugh>
 
Di Maria is a good player but not a £60m player. Since he lost a yard of pace he has become a cross between Fabregas and Hazard, not as good as either but cost more than both put together.

Actually that is an insult to Fab and Hazard, more like a cross between Ramires and Schurrle.

United needed to spend £30m on a more conventional midfielder such as Pogba or Vidal. UIR said you were getting them... but next year is your year now apparently <laugh>
 
London's Only EC Winners said:
Di Maria is a good player but not a £60m player. Since he lost a yard of pace he has become a cross between Fabregas and Hazard, not as good as either but cost more than both put together.

Actually that is an insult to Fab and Hazard, more like a cross between Ramires and Schurrle.

United needed to spend £30m on a more conventional midfielder such as Pogba or Vidal. UIR said you were getting them... but next year is your year now apparently <laugh>
Click to expand...

Funny how hes significantly better than both hazard and fabregas.

Di maria is top ten in the world. Hazard is the level below and fabregas isnt in consideration. Has fabregas been found yet after his disappearance the other week?
 
UnitedinRed said:
Funny how hes significantly better than both hazard and fabregas.

Di maria is top ten in the world. Hazard is the level below and fabregas isnt in consideration. Has fabregas been found yet after his disappearance the other week?
Click to expand...

Is that why he was hooked again on 71... most subbed player ever in one La Liga season.

He looked unhappy again today
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back