Ref cost Arsenal the game

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
"The ref wasn't booking their players" - Says crackhead looking Jack Sparrow.....
hmmm we had 4 bookings in that game, they had 3. <doh>
 
They should have had 3 sent off - Koscielny, Chambers and Wellbeck. However, Cahill should have gone too and (I think) he would have been first. Had that happened, it may have been a very different game.
 
chelsea - over 100 years of history said:
I'm torn on the Cahill one. More like an orange card - not quite a red but worse than a yellow ;)
Click to expand...
For a player who is not at all a "dirty" player, maybe Cahill should have got a red for a stupid tackle. I agree , perhaps not a straight red, but worse than a yellow. Ref got that one right I think. Incidently, Cahill has been playing extremely well all season as has JT. They seem to have worked out a way to cover their lack of real pace, well done to both.
 
So let me get this straight, aswell as bribing the referee to "fix" the game, did Roman also bribe all the Arsenal players to not have a single shot on target?
 
You're top of the league, easily the best team in England, partially helped by Pellegrini being a likeable fool, and yet your board is dead and you're discussing **** like this! Where are all the Chelsea fans?! Does Essex not get the internet?
 
Shteve said:
You're top of the league, easily the best team in England, partially helped by Pellegrini being a likeable fool, and yet your board is dead and you're discussing **** like this! Where are all the Chelsea fans?! Does Essex not get the internet?
Click to expand...

To be honest Shteveybhoy, I am not entirely sure what happened to this board, it used to be much more active than this.
There are quite a few Chelsea supporters on Not606, but most of them seem inactive nowadays, not sure why.
 
I've been to plenty of games thanks! Besides, during the off season me and my mate Roman often are sat around on top o the Butj Khalifa drinking champaign and munching on caviar! &#55357;&#56841;
 
Loving the psychoanalysis on the Arsenal board.

To be fair I though they played reasonably well. This was a proper London derby, tackles flying in, needle, controversy, and yes some moments of sublime skill.

When Arsenal get rid of Wenger they will be some force to reckon with, but for now his insistence on over elaborate, unfocussed, tippy tappy football, suits us fine.
Not sure what Oscar is having for breakfast, but I want some! For Wenger to single him out for criticism is quite ridiculous. Yes he spent most of the game putting his foot in a bit and breaking up play, but this is exactly what Ray Parlour used to do, in the days when Wenger knew how to win titles.
Still, they will still finish 4th, and make lots of money, which is all the board care about.

Other random observations;
Wilshire's hair annoys me. Just feel I want to dollop a bit pile of crap on it.
If Calum Chambers is an England international, god help us.
How good was Mikel when he came on? So underrated, but with one substitution, game over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back