underage sex

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
thefanwithnoname said:
you do know this is an internet forum?

on another note we had an away day (teacher training) once and had to do one of those get into groups, discuss then present

One teacher who had been in the game a lot longer than most of us spelt reigns as ranes

her subject wasnt english
Click to expand...

Spelling?
Grammar?
Punctuation?
Capital letters?
Sentence structure?

Do these things mean anything to you?

Teaching? It looks like you should still be in school yourself.
 
-jordan- said:
what the **** are you on about ya bellend?

you accused stereo of thinking and bringing up shagging a 15 year old, when you yourself stated it in the first ****ing post!
Click to expand...

really you thick ****er

my exact words were

'They all lokked well older and had I not recognised them I would have gone through with shagging one if I had pulled'

the 'lokked' was meant to be 'looked' apart from that where the **** does it say i was shagging/wanted to shag 15 year olds?

firstly it clearly says they looked older, secondly I recognised they were not, thirdly if i HAD pulled so no guarantee anyway even if they were older and I hadnt figured out their age

Jeez its like talking to 12 year olds

(see what i did there?)
 
StereoTypist said:
Spelling?
Grammar?
Punctuation?
Capital letters?
Sentence structure?

Do these things mean anything to you?

Teaching? It looks like you should still be in school yourself.
Click to expand...

When all else fails hit them with the spelling and grammar police eh.
 
StereoTypist said:
Spelling?
Grammar?
Punctuation?
Capital letters?
Sentence structure?

Do these things mean anything to you?

Teaching? It looks like you should still be in school yourself.
Click to expand...

honestly? NO not on a forum

but i have noticed this is what many resort to when they have nowt else to say
 
thefanwithnoname said:
really you thick ****er

my exact words were

'They all lokked well older and had I not recognised them I would have gone through with shagging one if I had pulled'

the 'lokked' was meant to be 'looked' apart from that where the **** does it say i was shagging/wanted to shag 15 year olds?

firstly it clearly says they looked older, secondly I recognised they were not, thirdly if i HAD pulled so no guarantee anyway even if they were older and I hadnt figured out their age

Jeez its like talking to 12 year olds

(see what i did there?)
Click to expand...

no.
 
CiaranArdoynian said:
When all else fails hit them with the spelling and grammar police eh.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's right son. He claims he used to be a teacher and posts a thread about 15 year old girls and sex but he can't spell, punctuate or structure a sentence properly.

And you defend him?!?

Some of us don't have zips up the back of our heads mate.
 
StereoTypist said:
Yeah, that's right son. He claims he used to be a teacher and posts a thread about 15 year old girls and sex but he can't spell, punctuate or structure a sentence properly.

And you defend him?!?

Some of us don't have zips up the back of our heads mate.
Click to expand...

He might be a teacher and he might not. Certainly how he constructs his sentences on an internet forum is not going to tell us.
 
StereoTypist said:
Yeah, that's right son. He claims he used to be a teacher and posts a thread about 15 year old girls and sex but he can't spell, punctuate or structure a sentence properly.

And you defend him?!?

Some of us don't have zips up the back of our heads mate.
Click to expand...

**** me. you should go into teaching if that is what you believe, as the saying goes

THOSE WHO CAN, TEACH
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back