OFFICIAL: Southampton sign Shane Long

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I always thought it would be odd if Burnley sold him this summer. £10-£12m is nothing compared to another season in the PL and Ings is their main chance of scoring the goals to keep them up

You don't fancy Jutkiewicz and Sordell then?
 
I really worry where the goals are coming from this season - you need about 40 to be competitive in the bottom half, for the life of me I can't see us scoring that many with the players we currently have.
 
I always thought it would be odd if Burnley sold him this summer. £10-£12m is nothing compared to another season in the PL and Ings is their main chance of scoring the goals to keep them up

Imagine how their fans would react... it's not worth it to them, when they're getting the extra commercial income and TV money.
 
I would much prefer us to be buying Ings even if it cost us as much as Osvaldo. He would be an investment for the future and the type of natural goalscorer we need. If we do end up buying Long, then, as always, I will reserve judgement on him until seeing him play for us. I don't think that the fee will be anywhere near £12m, just as Rickie's fee was misreported, it will be nearer what we paid for Pelle.
Ultimately it is better to have an experienced Premier League striker in rather than be short up front until Jay returns and it's not as if we cannot afford him.
 
I mean, four goals in 15 games. FOUR!?!?! Surely, even with this 'tremendous' scouting department of ours, the board can see that this isn't a good investment. I need a lie down.
 
How do Burnley have the magical power to say no when against the odds but we're powerless?

Release clauses and players throwing a strop. You don't see Ings acting a ****.
 
I mean, four goals in 15 games. FOUR!?!?! Surely, even with this 'tremendous' scouting department of ours, the board can see that this isn't a good investment. I need a lie down.

That's 1 goal in 4. If Lambert wasn't the penalty taker for us do you think his ratio would have been any better?

A clue: NO.
 
I'm really hoping this isn't true. I honestly can't understand why we don't just give this money to Burnley for Ings. I hope the board disclose the fee if it happens so we know whether they're barking mad or if Sky are chatting ****.

Maybe the board aren't so excited about signing a two season championship player who supports the saints.

*before I get battered, I have clearly said previously that I haven't seen Ings play more than the goal against us in the cup*

My point is the screaming that we haven't signed a player for 10-12m who has never played top flight football. I don't agree without for 10-12m, but FFS people sometimes don't think straight.
 
If Long proves himself to be half the playmaker Rickie was I'll be happy. A forward doesn't have to score tons of goals but he has to bring something to the party.