Couldnt agree more Its a poor excuse by the Club and/or Under Armour to put an extra bit of colour in the home kit and some 'style' in the away kit They also tried it with Grey in the first UA home kit Instead we have a 'piss tyre track' on thae away kit which is black and simply not a Spurs colour I cannot believe anyone would look at thos kits nd immeditatly think 'Bill Nicholson' They are running the risk of undoing all of the previous good work they have done in acknowledging Bill Nicholson since his passing
Really?! They seem about on a par to me, both with unnecessary lines that don't work(your away kit has lines that are supposed to connect between the shirt and shorts!). Yours has got that God awful badge on it too!
Er, no. please log in to view this image I can see why you tried to restrict it to this season though, as your 2nd and 3rd kits were both appalling last time out. please log in to view this image They're improving, I guess.
Intelligence is a myth perpetrated by the intelligence industry. Desire never takes long to beat aptitude. The perfect home shirt, as far as I'm concerned, is all white with a navy cockerel. The perfect away shirt is all navy with a white cockerel. We don't get them because the club wants to sell new shirts every year to the same people. The Liverpool shirt above makes sense if you picture it in the middle of one of those red circles with a diagonal red bar that means NO...
Whilst I agree that is the rationale, I would like to see the shirt sale figures for clubs like Chelsea & City whose kits very rarely change
Lloris wearing a slightly less offensive keeper's top: please log in to view this image No wonder he looks happy.
If you think our kits are bad, then be thankful that you don't support Spanish Segunda B side Cultural Leonesa: please log in to view this image At least people have heard of them now, I guess. Fellow Spaniards Deportivo Lugo have decided to look like a pint of beer, instead: please log in to view this image Whilst their keeper has a squid's appendage plastered across his chest: please log in to view this image
Just seen an interview with a Cultural Leonesa player and apparently the tuxedo kit is only for some pre-season charity tournament. Still looks ridiculous, but that's fairly acceptable under the circumstances.
Last year's 2nd and 3rd kit were awful (although the white/purple/black kit does grow on you a little). I don't mind this year's third kit... not so much as an athletic shirt- but as a casual wear shirt it's not bad... by warrior standards anyway.
Take the red out of it, plus the silly stripe and it wouldn't be too bad. What's the point in having red in the 3rd kit, anyway? Totally defeats the functional point of it and reduces it to a marketing gimmick. Always annoys me when clubs have their first kit's main colour in their other kits. Just an attempt to shift units, regardless of who does it.
Could be worse - there was that Brazilian club whose shirts featured the image of an Argentine who is best known for his exploits in Cuba please log in to view this image please log in to view this image Writing that ridiculously nonsensical sentence has given me a headache...
haha that tuxedo kit is amazingly ****! But so ****, it's actually quite good! I think I prefer the intentionally daft looking shirts like this one and the beer one. - We've actually tried to make ours nice, but seem to have failed, somewhat. I saw a picture on twitter of a yellow away kit. I hope this is true. This is by far the nicest, IMO. please log in to view this image
And yet I think that is awful also (yet to be confirmed as the 3rd kit admittedly) Its a shocking shade of yellow and the trim looks black If this is confirmed as the 3rd kit, I'll shall be snding another snotty email to the club as to a) why they persist with such sh1t designs in collaboration with Under Armour? b) why they persist with allowing colours which simply are not 'Spurs colours'?
