Apparently we've offered 34 million for Luke Shaw

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Matth_2014 said:
I'm happy that we've finally got him, he's going to be quality for us.
Click to expand...

Matth, you think everyone is going to be quality for you bud <ok>

You have made a Bale comparison already <doh>
Still waiting for Zaha to become the next Ronaldo, and Welbeck to be as good as Henry as you so classically stated on Twitter. <laugh>
 
Think Shaw will be a big success over the next 10 seasons or so unfortunately.

In that context the price is right... Great value over time.

On current ability/deal however - it's a huge risk/investment!

You've now spent how much money since things started to slide? Must be £100m by now. Is this ideal?
 
Master Yoda said:
Think Shaw will be a big success over the next 10 seasons or so unfortunately.

In that context the price is right... Great value over time.

On current ability/deal however - it's a huge risk/investment!

You've now spent how much money since things started to slide? Must be £100m by now. Is this ideal?
Click to expand...

It was long over due to be honest.
The fact that United were able to stay as dominant as they were against the "sugar daddy" clubs as we are called, without spending big, was a testament to how awesome SAF was at taking average players and turning them into a winning team.
When SAF retired, it became all too apparant what Uniteds recipe for success had been since 2007, one man.............Sir Alex Ferguson.

Anyone else that stepped in would have had to face spending £150m to get the squad up to date with Chelsea and City, Moyes didnt do that, hence why he failed hard.
LVG has recognised that it needs to be done, and is doing it....which is why i think United will be back in the top 4 next season
 
So as suspected all this bollox about Southampton not going to sell, fee being 40 million etc was indeed bollox. He's gone for an inflated fee because he's English but ultimately the big club won out again.
 
Bodanki said:
It was long over due to be honest.
The fact that United were able to stay as dominant as they were against the "sugar daddy" clubs as we are called, without spending big, was a testament to how awesome SAF was at taking average players and turning them into a winning team.
When SAF retired, it became all too apparant what Uniteds recipe for success had been since 2007, one man.............Sir Alex Ferguson.

Anyone else that stepped in would have had to face spending £150m to get the squad up to date with Chelsea and City, Moyes didnt do that, hence why he failed hard.
LVG has recognised that it needs to be done, and is doing it....which is why i think United will be back in the top 4 next season
Click to expand...

Absolutely. Just thinking of the club's finances?
 
Master Yoda said:
Think Shaw will be a big success over the next 10 seasons or so unfortunately.

In that context the price is right... Great value over time.

On current ability/deal however - it's a huge risk/investment!

You've now spent how much money since things started to slide? Must be £100m by now. Is this ideal?
Click to expand...

You are a Liverpool fan are you not?

Weve spent less than Liverpool in the PL era.....

13 titles

0 titles


Were allowed a splurge. probably the only club ( arsenal? ) who can splash the cash and justify it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back