Top four next year.....
- Thread starter SIR_KENNY_KLOPP_KING
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Now we can focus our attention on someone with truly myopic views!
Are you a bit of a heavy roller?
Our own posters are using the place less and less because of rivals insistence on making anything and everything about LFC into their business. Debates and even arguments are welcome but cheap insults, not so much
Understood. I get your point and its not something I like doing. But Dave really pisses me off.And why wasnt Dave given this telling off when he basically called KKK stupid and that he is a failure in life (in so many words).
My insult was a response to his own insult he made against KKK.
Dave does this time and time again. The debate didnt go his way and so he resorted to personal insults......
And why wasnt Dave given this telling off when he basically called KKK stupid and that he is a failure in life (in so many words).
My insult was a response to his own insult he made against KKK.
Dave does this time and time again. The debate didnt go his way and so he resorted to personal insults......
You know there's a real easy way of avoiding dave if he has that effect on you.
Frankly I think you're a decent poster but some of us are getting cheesed off with the unnecessary abuse dished out by rivals. In-house insults are par for the course, we all know each other and that's how it goes on here. And honestly I can't say dave insulted anyone but even if he did, isn't it up to the two of them to sort it?
You're not far wrong I'm sure.
Manchester Twonited, Everton, and CrysDull Pulis to be in a three way fight for the title.
Manchester 1, Chelsea, and Liverpool all going to be relegated for sure.
#ImBeingATwonitedFanFor1Minute
And by that rationale, if I then insult Dave, isnt it up to the two of us to sort it?.
hehe im just being a smart ass, bored at work. Sorry if it upset you.
And by that rationale, if I then insult Dave, isnt it up to the two of us to sort it?.
hehe im just being a smart ass, bored at work. Sorry if it upset you.
No, by that rationale you wouldn't be on here looking for comments that upset you
And just wait till you retire - see how cantankerous you get ......
Are you insinuating that i'm a bit of a unit?
No. You come across as a 'big hitter' in The City
This isn't something that I'd normally advertise as I don't usually judge people on 'what they've achieved in life' - quite often, the people who are most happy have done as little as they possibly can and really enjoyed life, while still being perfectly savvy.
But, for the record, don't worry, my academic background and business acumen and experience in numerous executive roles for both mid to large corporations stands up. I actually do deal with corporate strategy, employ big consultants (BCG, McKinsey et al) for big projects (so am very used to numerous buzzwords, acronyms and trendy models and 'paradigm shifts'.....these consultants are the sharpest that I know....but they are just consultants at the end of the day....I know how the world works, have rung the bell on wall street...well, was one of a crowd
I respect that you have a different view to me but just because you have, I would never question your credibility and get snipey...(ok, i'd take the piss a bit) regardless of whether you were unemployed, on the bins or an MBA lecturer.....I may disagree and debate my points vigorously...but that's different. I also wouldn't assume that my view was a jumped to conclusion and not one that looked at all conceivable possibilities but ruled them out....I'd also never ever rule out the possibility that I'm wrong.....and will always gladly look back and say so.....Perhaps, you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. This is after all a forum for us all to share our opinions isn't it? Just saying
It would appear that our work experiences have followed very similar paths. However when somebody makes what appears to me to be a snide comment such as "I assume that you haven't been hired by the Glazers then?" then I will feel free to respond in a similar vein. As some of your responses appeared to me to indicate a myopic view to the strategic analysis of the situation then again I will feel free to defend my argument. You may feel that you forwarded a vigorous response (with just a wee bit of piss taking) whereas I considered it to have be a hectoring insult. Nowhere in your responses did you even suggest that you might have considered alternative strategies. No argument was forwarded as to why your suggestions were more appropriate or why there may be flaws in mine. As you say the forum is here to share opinions - share being the operative word.
I still believe the risk factors associated with the big spend policy are just far too high. I further contend that the income stream will not be critically effected by taking a longer period to re-build on solid foundations. The most amusing thing to me is that I really hope that they do follow your strategy and fall flat on their faces which could well mean that they will take the best part of a decade to truly compete for the title.
I think you'll find that my little piss take came AFTER several snides from you mate I also think that if you did read it back (I personally can't be arsed), there's a ton more explanation to my opinion (not just by myself I hasten to add) than there is to yours.....but it remains just my opinion and should carry little weight.
Opinions can be shared, they don't have to be liked or agreed upon and i'm cool with that.....but maybe, if you don't like the piss taking/mud slinging....don't initiate it.....or assume that i'm some half brained fool who doesn't have a clue. You've done it before and tbh, I don't really care that you do, but you don't seem to like my response......
We can agree to disagree on what they will or will not do or what they should or should not do. Time will tell. Your last sentence I totally agree with!
No. You come across as a 'big hitter' in The City
I am neither a big hitter (depending on how you define this) or live or work in the City. I have a decent enough job and know some **** about business though. Clearly much more than I do about football
I also think that if you did read it back (I personally can't be arsed), there's a ton more explanation to my opinion (not just by myself I hasten to add) than there is to yours.....but it remains just my opinion and should carry little weight.
Opinions can be shared, they don't have to be liked or agreed upon and i'm cool with that.....but maybe, if you don't like the piss taking/mud slinging....don't initiate it.....or assume that i'm some half brained fool who doesn't have a clue. You've done it before and tbh, I don't really care that you do, but you don't seem to like my response......
We can agree to disagree on what they will or will not do or what they should or should not do. Time will tell. Your last sentence I totally agree with!
We'll have to agree to disagree about what they should do. But I honestly don't care what you think about me. If I think that your comments deserve a rejoinder then I'll deliver one. Your response is totally up to you.
And why wasnt Dave given this telling off when he basically called KKK stupid and that he is a failure in life (in so many words).
My insult was a response to his own insult he made against KKK.
Dave does this time and time again. The debate didnt go his way and so he resorted to personal insults......
You must log in or register to see images
S
Super G Ted'inho
Guest
And why wasnt Dave given this telling off when he basically called KKK stupid and that he is a failure in life (in so many words).
My insult was a response to his own insult he made against KKK.
Dave does this time and time again. The debate didnt go his way and so he resorted to personal insults......
Dava and KKK have been going at each other all day, who really gives a ****?
You taking the piss? Rejoinder relates to a sharp, yet witty response!
See, there you go again! The prime definition of the word rejoinder is a reply. The sharpness or otherwise, the wit that may or may not be involved is an additional though not necessary addition. So taking the piss? Answer NO. Having a good laugh at your inability to define things - most certainly.
S
Super G Ted'inho
Guest
See, there you go again! The prime definition of the word rejoinder is a reply. The sharpness or otherwise, the wit that may or may not be involved is an additional though not necessary addition. So taking the piss? Answer NO. Having a good laugh at your inability to define things - most certainly.
rejoinder
noun
a reply, especially a sharp or witty one.
"she would have made some cutting rejoinder but none came to mind"
synonyms: answer, reply, response, retort, riposte, counter, sally; More
Shall I define 'especially' for you?
You're getting a bit desperate now really, aren't you?
- Status