Andre Villas-Boas

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

KingHotspur

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2011
28,364
29,467
113
Glasgow
Confirmed as Chelsea manager on a 3 year deal.

Do you reckon he will do well there, considering Abramovich's lack of patience with managers?
 
he will be gone just in time for us to appoint him when harry leaves...but he will come to us with PL experince <ok>
 
He wasn't a player, which, unless you have the personality of Mourinho, is a big disadvantage.

Can you see Terry, Lampard, Drogba et al showing him respect when he demands it? He's no experience as a player and won little yet as a manager. It won't be easy to gain the support of the big name players or discipline them.

If the team aren't behind him from the start and results are relatively poor in the first half of the season, he's out by Xmas

Then you all have nothing to worry about then....
 
He wasn't a player, which, unless you have the personality of Mourinho, is a big disadvantage.

Can you see Terry, Lampard, Drogba et al showing him respect when he demands it? He's no experience as a player and won little yet as a manager. It won't be easy to gain the support of the big name players or discipline them.

If the team aren't behind him from the start and results are relatively poor in the first half of the season, he's out by Xmas

In his first proper full season he won the league, league cup & Europa league without losing a game.

Even in Portugal that's pretty spectacular!
 
If you're good enough, you're old enough <ok>

But for argument's sake, yes it is a big gamble.

A strange decision, but perhaps Roman feels that a change of tac is in order and views the manager's such as Ancellotti/Scolari/Jose didn't get him what he wanted, so why not gamble?
 
If I was in his shoes, I'd be looking to get rid of Terry or Lampard, just to show that I was in charge and that those that have disrupted the dressing room in the past are no longer untouchable.
Risky, but probably worth it.
 
If I was in his shoes, I'd be looking to get rid of Terry or Lampard, just to show that I was in charge and that those that have disrupted the dressing room in the past are no longer untouchable.
Risky, but probably worth it.

I suppose he may have the thinking of a clean slate. But any further disruptions get the banhammer unleashed <ok>
 
If I was in his shoes, I'd be looking to get rid of Terry or Lampard, just to show that I was in charge and that those that have disrupted the dressing room in the past are no longer untouchable.
Risky, but probably worth it.

But these players still have so much to offer, especially Terry who was one of our best players last season. I understand your theory but that can back fire spectacularly, aka 'the wally with a brolly' and beckham for England.

A good manager will make the right decisions for the team / club not merely to save face or show who is boss.
 
A manager can be excellent, but he won't be able to do his job properly if he's being undermined by a senior figure in the dressing room.
How many managers have Chelsea lost to player power?

Any chance of a job for Avram, by the way?
 
And this chap is 33, but been studying coaching since he was 17?

He probably knows a lot more when it comes to methods/tactics than some player earning his badges once he's hung up his boots.
 
What I don't get is why Spurs fans care? You are a midtable club that poses no threat to us <ok>

Because there's oh so much football to talk about at the moment <doh>

Typical Chav who's team's history began in 2003.

Nothing more than Millwall with a lottery win!

(no offence to the decent Chelsea poster)