More Ji nonsense

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I agree, very poor, and not the way I would want us to stay up, saddens me that the Club are going to try and pursue this. :(
 
Baring in mind this information has been out for ages now

Nee ****er gave a toss when we were bottom and looking like we were down, now suddenly everyone is righteous
 
Poyet's Eleven said:
Baring in mind this information has been out for ages now

Nee ****er gave a toss when we were bottom and looking like we were down, now suddenly everyone is righteous
Click to expand...

Absolutely! The league ain't gonna backtrack on their decision made months ago!

A very small straw being snatched at by 3 desperate clubs.
 
I am the only one a tiny bit concerned by this? Although, if we're safe by 6 to 9 points then they can take 1 - 3 from us and it won't mean ****.

I didn't see West Ham getting docked any points though.
 
Why can`t the FA simply issue a statement.

1) Ji was a registered Sunderland player.
2) There was a minor error in the paperwork on his return from loan.
3) The club informed the FA.
4) The club was punished by fine.
5) The fine has been paid.
6) The matter is closed.

How difficult is that?
 
When it came out no issues were raised by any club and the matter was closed. Everyone was satisfied with the punishment

Now that we've pulled ourselves out they're interested, that's pretty pathetic imo
 
RedandWhite_believer said:
I am the only one a tiny bit concerned by this? Although, if we're safe by 6 to 9 points then they can take 1 - 3 from us and it won't mean ****.

I didn't see West Ham getting docked any points though.
Click to expand...

The case is closed, I'd be very surprised if we were further punished. If we were they could only deduct 1 point, the simple solution to that is to win our two remaining games so we'll stay up by more than 1 point
 
Poyet's Eleven said:
The case is closed, I'd be very surprised if we were further punished. If we were they could only deduct 1 point, the simple solution to that is to win our two remaining games so we'll stay up by more than 1 point
Click to expand...

yes if they deducted 1 point and we still stayed up would there be legal action to take more points off until it meets the agenda, what a load of tosh the premier league has a rule that they can decide not to issue a points deduction if they deem the "offence" not to be significant - journo crap I think
 
grandpops said:
Why can`t the FA simply issue a statement.

1) Ji was a registered Sunderland player.
2) There was a minor error in the paperwork on his return from loan.
3) The club informed the FA.
4) The club was punished by fine.
5) The fine has been paid.
6) The matter is closed.

How difficult is that?
Click to expand...

From what I read earlier this week, the fault was as much the league's as the club's, which is why the repercussions were minimal.

This is going nowhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back