Blackburn v QPR ( MD Thread )

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Weds now 3-1 up at Forest......they are bound to beat us on Saturday even though they are in freefall.....
 
QPR Oslo said:
No stikers in January? I thought he brought in 4? 1 never seen, 1 injured long term after a few games, 1 can't score but playing tonight, 1 on the bench who everyone says is cr*p, though personally at his best looks the best of a poor 4. Arry's lost it, 4 might as well have ben none.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't call any of them the type of striker we needed. Everyone knew we needed a decent striker to partner Austin. When he got injured we needed two. We got an oldie and two poor so called strikers and a Brazilian kid who hasn't played once.
 
rangercol said:
Apart from Charlie, who is there worth bringing on?
Click to expand...

I will agree with you on that Col but loaning out hitchcock and relying on keane is shocking. So were our dealings in Jan transfer window

I mean Luke Young hasnt played for nigh on 2 years but starts tonight?????
 
WBA2_QPR3 said:
I will agree with you on that Col but loaning out hitchcock and relying on keane is shocking. So were our dealings in Jan transfer window

I mean Luke Young hasnt played for nigh on 2 years but starts tonight?????
Click to expand...

Yep.......fair points mate. Hitchcock is the most annoying one for me. Harry only likes "names". Really can't wait for him to go.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back