New banner vote - final

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

well?

  • yes

  • no

Results are only viewable after voting.
grandpops said:
Remember a lot of it`s going to be hidden by the way the page is set up.
Only the top half will be seen properly.
Same on all the sites.

You`re putting a hell of a lot of work into something which won`t be seen.

Something to be improved?
Click to expand...

That's why I wanted proper dimensions. I wanted to workout how much to leave out and do it split into two, the bottom bit that's blocked out was just going to be red and white stripes than have the banner in the top strip. It's resized to fit the screen so if i'm to compensate for the bottom part then the dimensions are essential.
 
The Funkadelic Phallus said:
That's why I wanted proper dimensions. I wanted to workout how much to leave out and do it split into two, the bottom bit that's blocked out was just going to be red and white stripes than have the banner in the top strip. It's resized to fit the screen so if i'm to compensate for the bottom part then the dimensions are essential.
Click to expand...

Sorry mate, wasn`t trying to interfere. I hadn`t realised the bit you showed was only the top half i.e. the bit actually seen properly..
 
grandpops said:
Sorry mate, wasn`t trying to interfere. I hadn`t realised the bit you showed was only the top half i.e. the bit actually seen properly..
Click to expand...

What you sorry for fella? Just pondering with you and I agree. No that one I did didn't take into account that annoying gap. I think I can get it close but unless I can get the dimensions from Mick, which isn't going to happen, I won't get it exact. :(

Punching above my weight here, any input is welcome <ok>
 
The Funkadelic Phallus said:
What you sorry for fella? Just pondering with you and I agree. No that one I did didn't take into account that annoying gap. I think I can get it close but unless I can get the dimensions from Mick, which isn't going to happen, I won't get it exact. :(
Click to expand...

Too clever for me Bri, wouldn`t know where to start.
The content looks excellent to me mind.
Keep going mate, you`ll get there. :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
Gustavo's Steamer said:
yesss - future proof too
Click to expand...

Wise Men Say........... said:
almost prefect, just missing the g-force for me

in fact thats genius byron, ****ing love it

if thats the finished article i'm happy
Click to expand...

I want the G force in there only I can't find a suitable image. What about bringing some colour into it? I'll knock up another similar only have the badge, Quillips and Bally in full colour and see which looks best.

Love the way that the 73 cup final winning goal looks like it's been scored at the SoL
 
if a banner is designed ie shown without players it would have a longer shelf life ,do we need to keep living in the past with players of yesteryear ,we have a fantastic ,ground ,club badge and blackcat symbol .
Not complaining its only a suggestion
 
Hello Mate, dunno whether this helps but the current banner can be viewed independently here: - http://www.not606.com/styles/car/Sunderland.jpg

It appears to be 1880 x 367 pixels

On any web page if you click on the view button in the tool bar and then select source you can see how the web page is constructed. Most of it is gobbledegook but you can find what you're looking for there, usually.

line 81 on the home page shows the banner details.
 
The nostalgia of days gone by and the wonder of all I've missed gives me a funny tingle in my gut. But it's going to a vote so I'll knock you up something Stu <ok>
 
Shy Tall Knight said:
Hello Mate, dunno whether this helps but the current banner can be viewed independently here: - http://www.not606.com/styles/car/Sunderland.jpg

It appears to be 1880 x 367 pixels

On any web page if you click on the view button in the tool bar and then select source you can see how the web page is constructed. Most of it is gobbledegook but you can find what you're looking for there, usually.

line 81 on the home page shows the banner details.
Click to expand...

I'm working from 1250x318 so hopefully that will be fine. <ok> cheers fella.
 
1
You must log in or register to see images

2
You must log in or register to see images

3
You must log in or register to see images

4
You must log in or register to see images

5
You must log in or register to see images

6
You must log in or register to see images
 
The Funkadelic Phallus said:
1
You must log in or register to see images

2
You must log in or register to see images

3
You must log in or register to see images

4
You must log in or register to see images

5
You must log in or register to see images

6
You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...

4 or 5 but missing the g-force

You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back