William Hills latest title odds. 11-10 Chelsea. 11-8 Man City 11-2 Liverpool#before 5-1 16-1 Arsenal. 200-1 Tottenham. 500-1 Man Utd. 750-1 Everton
everyone sees the truth about arsenal. February came round and they imploded. they are playing for 3rd and the fa cup now. I'd like to know the odds for utd to get 4th guys... the only club they can catch is arsenal now
I can't see United getting 4th ahead of Arsenal. I said quite some time back that Spurs might take 4th off Arsenal though.
there's more chance of the sun going nova than utd winning the CL. even if olympiakos flop at the toilet frankly utd will get murdered in the QFs
William Hill's latest title odds: 5-6 Chelsea 7-4 Manchester City. 5-1 Liverpool#Last week 5-1 (unchanged) 16-1 Arsenal 200-1 Tottenham 500-1 Man United 750-1 Everton
William Hill's latest title odds. 6-4 Chelsea 6-4 Man City 5-2 Liverpool# last week 5-1 50-1 Arsenal 1000-1 Everton 1000-1 Man Utd 1000-1 Tottenham
William Hill's title odds. 8-11 Man City 9-4 Liverpool#last week 5-2 5-1 Chelsea 66-1 Arsenal #Our fate in our own hands.
William Hill: Man City @ 4-5 (£1 stake returns £1.80) Liverpool @ 13-8 (£1 stake returns £2.62) Chelsea @ 7-1 (£1 stake returns £8.00) Whyt he **** are Chelsea so long...?
True. They are too long for a team only 2 points behind, that bar us, has played all big teams. I suppose Mou's mind games affect betting men in particular. Beware of the Chavski.
If you're willing to bet against Liverpool, 7-1 is tempting IMO (I'm not prepared to). just thought their odds would be shorter with the run in they have. Same as 33-1 on Man Utd to win the CL is very good odds too but the reason for that is slightly more obvious
At the risk of starting a war again... Bookmakers offer odds designed give them a % profit regardless of the outcome. As bookmakers are no more clairvoyant than the rest of us, the amount put in by the punters is a factor in their calculations. So, if Chavs win, a small number of punters get a big pay-off, but this is offset by the larger number of people who lose their money betting on us or City.
What sort of useless debating skill is that? Actually, I couldn't remember which side of the debate they were on because I fell asleep after two or three posts. And if you agreed with Tobes he'd still argue with you anyway.