H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
I know some of you secretly hold out the hope that LOLdado is going to "come good."
For a long time, I felt like that about Torres. "Dear Lord!" I used to say to myself, "Surely, even Mad Dog would not fork out £50 million on someone as bad as Torres had become!"
Of course, Torres hasn't come good. Yes, he's had the odd spell, but I doubt that any Chav, with his hand on heart, would say that he thinks that was £50 million well spent.
For most of us, that's exactly how it's going to be with LOLdado. Even if he perks up a bit and starts to earn his wages (which I still very much doubt, incidentally), it'll be too little too late, and you'll all be left with that feel, "he was never really worth what the club forked out for him."
Now and here's the real point of this thread - the Gooners will, comparatively, get more out of Ozil than we will out of LOLLY; but it will still never be quite enough for Gooners to turn round and say to anyone, with any degree of conviction, "Yeah, he was worth the £42 million the club spunked away on him."
The question posed by this thread is, contrary to what some smirking juvenile Gooners are trying to make out, not an easy one to answer at this point in time.
Yes, Ozil has fared better, but no where near good enough to justify the money paid for him. No, LOLLY has scored anywhere enough goals to justify what we blew on him, but if he bangs in a couple before the end of the season (even in games that we don't win, a la Bent), he won't have been a complete and utter waste.
Ultimately, neither player is looking to have been a shrewd purchase by his respective club.
For a long time, I felt like that about Torres. "Dear Lord!" I used to say to myself, "Surely, even Mad Dog would not fork out £50 million on someone as bad as Torres had become!"
Of course, Torres hasn't come good. Yes, he's had the odd spell, but I doubt that any Chav, with his hand on heart, would say that he thinks that was £50 million well spent.
For most of us, that's exactly how it's going to be with LOLdado. Even if he perks up a bit and starts to earn his wages (which I still very much doubt, incidentally), it'll be too little too late, and you'll all be left with that feel, "he was never really worth what the club forked out for him."
Now and here's the real point of this thread - the Gooners will, comparatively, get more out of Ozil than we will out of LOLLY; but it will still never be quite enough for Gooners to turn round and say to anyone, with any degree of conviction, "Yeah, he was worth the £42 million the club spunked away on him."
The question posed by this thread is, contrary to what some smirking juvenile Gooners are trying to make out, not an easy one to answer at this point in time.
Yes, Ozil has fared better, but no where near good enough to justify the money paid for him. No, LOLLY has scored anywhere enough goals to justify what we blew on him, but if he bangs in a couple before the end of the season (even in games that we don't win, a la Bent), he won't have been a complete and utter waste.
Ultimately, neither player is looking to have been a shrewd purchase by his respective club.

