Standing Up

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

perrymanlegend

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2011
2,947
518
113
Sydney,Australia
Just read an article on the beeb website that Bristol City are installing a standing area to their revamped ground.
It is the same of what Dortmund have at their stadium- its called railway seating, can be pushed back for standing or used for extra seats.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/26141427
Knowing that a certain group of our supporters like standing at the Lane I'd like to get some thoughts on whether its feasible for the PL.
I remember standing at the Park Lane end as a kid and there's nothing like it.
Over to you lads.
 
Would love it.

I've been threatened to have been removed from the ground 3 times this season already after numerous arguments with stewards at refusing sit down that it'll be bliss to finally stand and support my team without some orange-coated twat thinking they're part of a military covert operation tasked with making people sit down. ****ing jobsworths do my head in.

Safe standing would 100% get my vote. All that needs to be done is remove the seats, replace with a railing and voila.
 
The Football League are lobbying Parliament with this and have been for some time, it is the law afterall following the Taylor report post Hillsborough. I'm not sure if setting a precedent here will have the FA following suit. Other countries haven't had a 'Hillsborough' on their doorstep, so the subject perhaps isn't so thorny there. Although this criteria fits UEFA and FIFA guideines, the German teams still have to have the seats in place for league games and are only raised for European/other games.

To answer the question, yes, having grown up on it, I'd like standing room again.
 
The Football League are lobbying Parliament with this and have been for some time, it is the law afterall following the Taylor report post Hillsborough. I'm not sure if setting a precedent here will have the FA following suit. Other countries haven't had a 'Hillsborough' on their doorstep, so the subject perhaps isn't so thorny there. Although this criteria fits UEFA and FIFA guideines, the German teams still have to have the seats in place for league games and are only raised for European/other games.

To answer the question, yes, having grown up on it, I'd like standing room again.

Several have, actually: Russia had the Luzhniki Stadium disaster in 1982 where 66 died, Scotland has seen two disasters at Ibrox (25 died in 1902, 66 died in 1971), and there's been similar disasters in Turkey, South Africa, Ghana, Greece, and Egypt over the years.

The problem is that whenever the subject of standing in stadiums is raised, it's always shouted down by people bringing up Hillsbrough - yet the fact is the Taylor report did not state that standing should be banned. The recommendations in regards to terraces are as follows:

Maximum Capacities for Terraces

* 1. Where a viewing terrace is divided into pens or areas which are self-contained, the Safety Certificate should specify the maximum number of spectators to be admitted to each such pen or area. A pen or area is to be deemed "self-contained" notwithstanding that it has a gate or gates affording access to another pen or area and whether such gate or gates be open or shut.

* 2. Each figure for maximum capacity should be assessed in accordance with Chapter 16 of the Green Guide ("the Green Guide figure") subject to the following qualifications:-
(a) in arriving at "the Green Guide figure", proper and realistic allowance must be made for all factors which should reduce the permissible density in accordance with the range of maximum figures specified in paragraphs 221 and 222 of the Green Guide;
(b) after assessing "the Green Guide figure", a deduction of 15% should be made to improve the safety margin.

* 3. Arrangements should be made:-
(a) to limit the number of spectators entering each self-contained pen or area to the maximum capacity figure assessed in accordance with Recommendation 2 above either electronically, mechanically, by a ticketing arrangement, by counting or otherwise, and
(b) to close off further access to such pen or area when its maximum capacity is about to be reached.

Filling and Monitoring Terraces
* 4. There should be a written agreement between the club and the police setting out their respective responsibilities for crowd safety and control and in particular for the filling of each self-contained pen or
other terraced area and the monitoring of spectators in each such pen or area to avoid overcrowding. Any variation of the agreement in respect of an individual match should be agreed in writing in advance.

* 5. At each match, there should be on the perimeter track, for each self-contained pen or other terraced area, a steward (if the club is monitoring that area) or a police officer (if the police are monitoring it) whose sole duty is to check crowd conditions in that area for possible overcrowding or distress throughout the period the area is occupied by spectators. Whoever is so appointed should be in addition to any other steward or police presence. He should have ready access to the police officer authorised under Recommendation 9 below, and by radio to the control room.

It doesn't say grounds should change to all-seater stadiums anywhere in the report.
 
Having a Dortmund-esque kop would be a useful option, allowing those who want to stand to do so without forcing it upon those who'd prefer to sit.
It seems to instill a better atmosphere, promote singing and chanting and get other parts of the ground more into the game, too.
As long as the whole thing's approached sensibly and safety concerns are addressed as a priority, then I think it'd be good for the club.
 
Several have, actually: Russia had the Luzhniki Stadium disaster in 1982 where 66 died, Scotland has seen two disasters at Ibrox (25 died in 1902, 66 died in 1971), and there's been similar disasters in Turkey, South Africa, Ghana, Greece, and Egypt over the years.

The problem is that whenever the subject of standing in stadiums is raised, it's always shouted down by people bringing up Hillsbrough - yet the fact is the Taylor report did not state that standing should be banned. The recommendations in regards to terraces are as follows:



It doesn't say grounds should change to all-seater stadiums anywhere in the report.

Read my post properly...the government banned it.

People bring up Hillsborough because thats what prompted the Taylor Report.

I did not mean there have been no other accidents either, just none that have resonated through football and still mentioned today, the magnitude of Hillsborough....get it now! <doh>

Quite frankly you've taught me nothing I didn't know, nor contributed anything here????? just homed in on the usual non essential facts missing the main points.
 
Read my post properly...the government banned it.

People bring up Hillsborough because thats what prompted the Taylor Report.

I did not mean there have been no other accidents either, just none that have resonated through football and still mentioned today, the magnitude of Hillsborough....get it now! <doh>

Quite frankly you've taught me nothing I didn't know, nor contributed anything here????? just homed in on the usual non essential facts missing the main points.

How about you read my post properly, specifically the part that states "It doesn't say grounds should change to all-seater stadiums anywhere in the report."

No disasters on the scale of Hillsborough, you say? 127 died in the Accra Sports Stadium in 2001, which makes it bigger on a human scale, whilst the Heysel disaster also resonated through football and is still mentioned today.

Maybe you'd learn something you don't know, and judging by your reply there's plenty you don't know other than how to be unnecessarily arsey in response to my posts, if you pulled your head out of your backside once in a while.
 
Would love it.

I've been threatened to have been removed from the ground 3 times this season already after numerous arguments with stewards at refusing sit down that it'll be bliss to finally stand and support my team without some orange-coated t**t thinking they're part of a military covert operation tasked with making people sit down. f**king jobsworths do my head in.

Safe standing would 100% get my vote. All that needs to be done is remove the seats, replace with a railing and voila.

If only you had taken that anger management course years back...:tongue:

No, there should be a "safe" standing area, as standing could never return like it was before, its just not feasible but an area for standing, for fans that want to stand is feasible, I didn't get to many games where standing was still around, Fulham was one as my mate was a Fulham fan growing up and we went to a game as they had standing, but unfortunately football has too many idiots who after a few drinks before the game would barge and push their way around, you always get these types! that are likely to cause a fight and as soon as a fight happens then there will be a problems again.

But aslong as they had good stewards and CCTV, then "safe standing area" should return.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26158044

Aston Villa have told the BBC that almost half the clubs in the Premier League are interested in reintroducing standing at their stadiums.

Villa have offered to conduct a trial of 'rail-seats' at Villa Park.

Their football operations manager Lee Preece said: "We'd be interested in a trial at Villa Park if that would help.

"We've identified areas we could use for a small-scale trial so the rest of football could see if it works within a Premier League environment."

He added: "There's at least seven or eight clubs that have come forward to say they are also interested in furthering the debate."
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26158044

Aston Villa have told the BBC that almost half the clubs in the Premier League are interested in reintroducing standing at their stadiums.

Villa have offered to conduct a trial of 'rail-seats' at Villa Park.

Their football operations manager Lee Preece said: "We'd be interested in a trial at Villa Park if that would help.

"We've identified areas we could use for a small-scale trial so the rest of football could see if it works within a Premier League environment."

He added: "There's at least seven or eight clubs that have come forward to say they are also interested in furthering the debate."

I wish Villa phrased this differently, saying something more along the lines of "We are interested in re-introducing standing at our ground and believe other Premier League clubs feel the same." The way they phrased it actually takes away from what they are saying, as it instantly paints them in a minority (because they say that more than half of Premier League clubs don't want standing), plus it puts other clubs on the spot to support them which can often backfire.

Standing could certainly reintroduce atmosphere into some stadiums that have lost theirs, which is something that can be said for a lot of modern grounds that seem muted compared to their predecessors (which is a sticking point for many QPR fans in regards to their proposed new stadium) but the issue is that it needs to be properly managed, meaning that stewards and police should be vigilant but not overzealous. The problem I see is you're more likely going to see overzealous policing ejecting people for minor infractions which will soon drain the atmosphere and make the exercise redundant.
 
I don't see the problem with having safe standing areas in this day and age.

With the design tech available, planners can work out how many people can fit into a safe area, and with computerized turnstiles and gates, they can tell straight away when capacity is reached.

I work at Lansdowne road on matchdays, and 'event control' are always updating over the radio leading up to kick off, the current attendance and the rate of people coming through the turnstiles. I'm sure the same is done in Prem and League stadiums in England too.

With the overheads needed to run a club, I'm surprised all clubs aren't pushing for this, to get a boost in income with larger attendances.
 
Discussions of Hillsborough often forget the sad fact that the supporters were caged in like animals so when it all went wrong there was nowhere for them to go. Without a cage a lot of them could have spilled onto the pitch, not ideal but 100% more satisfactory than death. The people that put up the cages have a lot to answer for and never have done. The seating issue is almost a red herring compared to that.
 
No brainer for me, safe standing is a must. Cheaper tickets, better atmosphere and more fans.

I really think in years to come we will all look back at all seaters and be amazed it lasted so long.
 
Discussions of Hillsborough often forget the sad fact that the supporters were caged in like animals so when it all went wrong there was nowhere for them to go. Without a cage a lot of them could have spilled onto the pitch, not ideal but 100% more satisfactory than death. The people that put up the cages have a lot to answer for and never have done. The seating issue is almost a red herring compared to that.

Another thing that's overlooked is the Leppings Lane end was an accident waiting to happen - it so nearly happened to us in the 1981 FA Cup semi. The fact that Hillsborough did not have a valid safety certificate since 1979, a fact that members of Sheffield city council attempted to cover up at the time, is also overlooked - it makes The FA culpable, as surely they should have known this.
 
Man Utd have now announced that they're backing the move toward safe standing. Interesting development.
 
Being on the young side is a great help for standing but the older fans a seat is required.
But when I look back standing was great fun even in cold weather when your legs felt as though they had gone to sleep!
I cannot remember any serious crowd problems at The Lane,unless they shut the gates early!!!!
I can actually remember standing in a full house at the Lane behind (and almost inside) a young shapely lady.I don't remember much of the game!!!!!!

MEMORIES..............
 
As an outsider, standing does seem like a better option, as long as it can be done safely. (A football game flies by to someone who's used to four hour baseball and gridiron games. All sitting does is jam my knees against plastic, so standing would be more comfortable.)

IMO, safety should be double insured, both by strictly limiting the number of people in a standing area, and by providing some kind of way of quickly relieving excessive pressure on the edges of the area. There's a long history of people getting crushed by hard barriers in front of them and crowd pressure behind. Those hard barriers have got to be movable, and very quickly movable at that. A third way to ensure safety is to divide the standing areas into small subsections. The more people are in an area, the more pressure can build up on those in front.
 
Being on the young side is a great help for standing but the older fans a seat is required.
But when I look back standing was great fun even in cold weather when your legs felt as though they had gone to sleep!
I cannot remember any serious crowd problems at The Lane,unless they shut the gates early!!!!
I can actually remember standing in a full house at the Lane behind (and almost inside) a young shapely lady.I don't remember much of the game!!!!!!

MEMORIES..............

that must have been my other half <laugh>,when she used to go to games with me