If that's the only contract the board will offer then we'll be stuck with ex-players/journeymen managers and it will be confirmed that the board is full of ****e and has no ambition whatsoever.
Lennon isn't getting grief for just failing to win a Treble, Bib.That's nothing more than selective reasoning. Lennon is doing my nut in for a number of reasons. The Aberdeen result was the straw that broke the camel's back for me.
OK.
So, the games that preceded that (M'well H, Hibs A, Killie H) was where we played our best football of the season.
We won't splash out on a manager because the manager will only have so much of a say in who we sign anyway.
Trust me, some folk wanted Strachan out and were pleased when we got Mowbray (dare I say quite a sizeable majority?) because "Strachan's brand of fitba has turned me off", "Mowbray will have us playing an attacking, passing game" etc etc.
It's hagiography to deny that's what most folk thought.
Just be careful what you wish for.
We get rid of Lennon and replace him with someone like Laudrup - Laudrup fails to get us into the UCL, Laudrup gets bumped Mowbray-style and we end up with Danny McGrain managing the team?
I don't want another Mowbray or Brady - someone who's supposed to bring back a certain type of attacking, silky flair to our play who then gets us ****ing nowhere.
I get that people are annoyed at Lennon's team selections - was there ever a Celtic manager who didn't get those moans?
