Article: Southampton vs Chelsea Official Match Thread | Southampton FC, Football

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Last question first: a realistic saints fan.

Yes we could have conceded a couple in first ten minutes and then for the next 50 minutes they could have conceded a couple easily. I don't understand why you find my post unbelievable; all the neutrals seem to be saying what a genius Jose mourinho was today for his changes.... Why would he need to change it if things were going so well? Oh, maybe because we were causing them problems. At times it was end to end and very exciting by both teams.

Lallana gave the ball away more than Ramirez, as someone earlier pointed out statistically. I felt for both actually as I think the conditions didn't help some of their play.

Wasn't Jayrod supposed to be the outlet to relieve pressure?

I stand by the fact that after the first ten minutes, we started to get hold of the ball and cause them as many problems as they caused us. After the first goal it all changed, but until then we played well.

Believable.

That`s about right, F.
 
I love the FULL STOP. Well done fella, good debate. It isn't full stop as I read that Lallana was caught in possession 12 times compared to Ramirez who got caught 8 times. That's 50% worse. I forgot my note pad so I don't know which ones are correct.

I put down your view, not every other one contrary to mine. I did that because I didn't agree with it.

Fair enough ;-)
My argument was how easily they lost the ball. Fair to say neither were top of their game today.
 
2nd half we were poor. Chelsea completely dominated us then, just like they did at Stamford Bridge. First half, I thought we played quite well, but we don't normally play two halves where we create lots of chances in both. Chelsea were always going to come out stronger after the break so we had to take our chances when we had them. Our only decent striker this season has been Rodriguez, who was the only striker who started the game, and he wasn't even played up front!
 
Should we be congratulating the Ground staff for getting a near perfect pitch in impossible weather conditions, or cursing them because it wasn't postponed until we are more fit for purpose?
 
I love the FULL STOP. Well done fella, good debate. It isn't full stop as I read that Lallana was caught in possession 12 times compared to Ramirez who got caught 8 times. That's 50% worse. I forgot my note pad so I don't know which ones are correct.

I put down your view, not every other one contrary to mine. I did that because I didn't agree with it.


It also important where you lose the ball. If you lose the ball in the final third of the pitch, no big deal. But if you lose it needlesly in the middle of the park, then the opponent will caught you off balance and launch a dangerous counterattack.

I don't mind when Gaston loses the ball in the final third trying something creative to break the deadlock, but it often not the case. Today he lost at least 4 ball too softly in the centre of the midfield and as a consequence Chelsea hit us on the counter.

I don't understand how people fail to see that. Mayde I should make a video compilation?
 
It also important where you lose the ball. If you lose the ball in the final third of the pitch, no big deal. But if you lose it needlesly in the middle of the park, then the opponent will caught you off balance and launch a dangerous counterattack.

I don't mind when Gaston loses the ball in the final third trying something creative to break the deadlock, but it often not the case. Today he lost at least 4 ball too softly in the centre of the midfield and as a consequence Chelsea hit us on the counter.

I don't understand how people fail to see that. Mayde I should make a video compilation?

I believe some people would like us to field a team of Ramirez and Wanyamas, running around giving the ball to the opposition, with a few cute flicks and tasty challenges thrown in.
 
Two possibilities for what happened just after half time:

1. A stroke of genius by "The Special One"

2. A routine substitution for Chelsea, one that brought onto the pitch, in two players, £49,350,000 worth of footballing talent.

Hardly a surprise (to me at least) that we suffered.

Vin
 
I believe some people would like us to field a team of Ramirez and Wanyamas, running around giving the ball to the opposition, with a few cute flicks and tasty challenges thrown in.

Ramirez I can understand, even though I don't entirely agree with, but wanyama has been one of our most important players this season. It beggars belief how much grief he gets.
 
Ramirez I can understand, even though I don't entirely agree with, but wanyama has been one of our most important players this season. It beggars belief how much grief he gets.

People just like to lose their **** when we lose.
 
Four Chelsea fans arrested for use of pyrotechnics and assault on stewards at SFC v CFC today, that's a blow for them, hopefully banned for a while at least.
 
I know a ref was hit recently and an artificial pitch was burnt in Scotland...sadly I suspect there will be a tragedy soon. Idiots won't be told until somebody gets hurt...let's hope it's the person who takes it into the ground....though apparently they are getting their kids to help :(
 
Oh dear, Kelv beaten at his near post again. Should have had the near post covered for the 3rd goal.
 
To be frank, Chelsea will defeat most teams in this division three nil. I wouldn't concern myself too much with today's loss. We've got most of the big teams out of the way now and several key squad members are coming back to full fitness. We'll be fine and kick on for the rest of the season. 8th or 9th at the edn of the season, for a young and small squad in its second year in the Premiership is a admirable result.
 
It also important where you lose the ball. If you lose the ball in the final third of the pitch, no big deal. But if you lose it needlesly in the middle of the park, then the opponent will caught you off balance and launch a dangerous counterattack.

I don't mind when Gaston loses the ball in the final third trying something creative to break the deadlock, but it often not the case. Today he lost at least 4 ball too softly in the centre of the midfield and as a consequence Chelsea hit us on the counter. I don't understand how people fail to see that. Mayde I should make a video compilation?

You raise a good point. I would not argue that Ramirez made the most bad passes and it led to Chelsea attacks on the counter. It's something to look at for future games.

But I would also argue that we were completely unable to break down Chelsea regardless. Does it really make a difference if Ramirez passes the ball away vs. Lallana not making the pass and getting disposessed instead? Or Schneiderlin. Did he make a forward pass the entire game? And I have no idea how to pull up the relevant stats via Sqawka or whatever, but from watching the game I felt like the guy who lost more important balls (not via bad passes, but just 50/50 balls, getting tackled, harried into mistakes that didn't show up as an intercepted passes) was probably Cork. Not that I blame him either.

Nor I am blaming Lallana or Schneiderlin. But I felt like Chelsea put up a wall in midfield and our only options were to try and play something clever or dork around and pass it back to the defense. The high line we try to play was completely obliterated. They had us pinned so far back that the midfield was in fact the "final third" and if we didn't break them there we were sunk.

We had the same problem last year. Even in the Championship. When we get pushed back we have difficulty moving the ball from the back line to attack even though we had players running their heads off trying to cover on defense and then transitioning to offense. When MP took over, the major change was that we didn't get pushed as deep. And I think that was further buttressed this year with the addition of Wanyama and Lovren. We played in the opposition half and not our own. That's no longer the case.

Maybe we should have valued possession and defense more. And in that case, Ramirez was wrong and made bad mistakes. But that is more the fault of Pochettino. Or just a symptom of the side just not being good enough to try and dictate terms. If you are out to park the bus, Ramirez is the wrong guy to play. It's a fault of Ramirez that he lacks that dimension, but it's mostly on Pochettino for expecting a creative attacking midfield type to play that role and trying to impose our game against a better side.