what i want to know is why did the first 9ish of our corners pan out exactly the same, eg, hit first defender. It was literally like watching a replay, which made me think it might actually be a tactic.

"the answer is more like 30"
What is ??
Proper use of stats would look at how many corners a team concedes in a PL season, and how many
goals conceded from a corner. That would give the ratio for that team.
And for any given opponent, you would look at the corners won/scored ratio (because some teams
may be better than others) .
And then before KO, a stats-driven manager would make the executive decision for his back four.
In the case of Spurs I suspect the concede and score stats from corners are much worse than
the PL averages.
If it's that easy to increase our chances, or any teams chance of scoring then why aren't short corners more widely used?
But everyone does the same which is why the distribution ends up random. I think its because the skill in defending a corner is so much lower than the skill needed to score from one which means few goals are scored and you get a random distribution of which teams score them. Man Utd had a of good record of scoring from corners last season but that was the only real outlier in the data"Interestingly while some teams are better than others (and you are right about Spurs) the distribution is consistent with being random
so it doesn't necessarily imply that anyone has any skill in either scoring or defending corners."
If there is no obvious distribution, then you would work to ensure you at least have the average
stats each season for corner goals scored/conceded.
Wasteful delivery![]()
The scatter is much larger than the skill. You need to spend time working on things where the opposite is true"Essentially half the teams will be below average and there is precious little you can do about it."
If the average scored is 5 and you only score 2, you have a bit more work to do.
Similar if the average conceded is 5 and you concede 8.
yeah, but wasting it in exactly the same way makes me think its a deliberate ploy. What are the chances of ****ing up a delivery the same 9 times in a row? I mean, Holtby is a premier league footballer kicking a stationary ball
I would need to see the histograms myself, and the info on the raw data sources, first.
And also, driving onwards to some goal when little effort is required, is something that
businesses often do (competitor parity etc) .
I have no stats on this but i'd like our corner taker to simply toe punt it hard from corners to see if we have more luck. Some will go straight out for goal kicks and some might put our opposition straight through on goal (perhaps push Lloris 40yds out) but i think we'd have more chance of scoring ourselves than our current tactic of actually trying to do something meaningful.
Corners are easy to defend because they are all the same. The defenders would have no idea where a toe punt was going or what it was gonna do in the air, thus giving our attackers more of a chance (eg, might get some luck and go in off a backside)
Lennon does not get to take a corner still. I bet his toe punts are puny
One other method would be to have the corner taker play it short, who then scoops the ball up, back to the corner taker, he then launches the ball in the air and I mean high in the air with the aim to have the ball dropping in the centre of the goal,
As the ball is starting the drop the keeper is feeling the pressure knowing he has to catch the ball.
He flaps , we score.
Ref calls a foul for the keeper diving!
.........back to the drawing board!
Agreed and I've been approximating the data as I don't have the book with me so ther may be scope for different interpretations.I would need to see the histograms myself, and the info on the raw data sources, first.
And also, driving onwards to some goal when little effort is required, is something that
businesses often do (competitor parity etc) .
Statistically, it has been shown that if you score more goals than your opponents, you will win more matches!...![]()