Cheeky ****, how about you stop blubbing like a petulant **** stain & answer these posers you ignored earlier?
Drama queen
If you'd lived in Germany circa 1939 how many Jews would you have gassed?
Ridiculous post.... And here lies the problem... small-minded people who don't want to change, and therefore compare that change however great or small to the most tyrannical events in history.
I was asking you a question not comparing the situation with historic events. Simply asking you if you have also been a yes man drama queen in another situation.
Let me put it another way:-
Do you believe having someone in charge of the club who is so volatile he threatens to run down the club if his proposals are questioned is a healthy situation to be in?
At what point does he cross the line?
Are you so enamoured by the PL that you'd agree with all he proposes?
In what way do you believe Hull Tigers will be a financial revelation?
Do you believe the name change proposal is a result of his spat with the council?
Who's your second team?
Your questions were irrelevant.
You seem to confuse private ownership with public ownership, stakeholders vs. shareholders and fans vs. customers.
As a private owner, Allam is not accountable to any public shareholders which you seem to think the fans are.
The fans are customers, but the term customer covers more than just fans. It is any entity that is willing to buy your product or services. Every business chooses which customers they are going to focus on, and which customer segments they want to increase.
He has decided that the revenue from the CTID customers will not make the club financially sustainable, nor will it put the club into demise without it. Hence his offer to compensate the season ticket holders with their "investment" back.
So yes, in a free market, I'm happy for an owner to run a business the way that he sits fit because it is his investment that is at risk.


I love it. I reckon you're Lunchbox.