I'd imagine people are wary because we let him back on our board after such similar grovelling only for him to use it as a vehicle for greater wumming but at the end of the day I suppose its up to them but he's hardly a role model is he!
One man's wumming is another's banter, Ozzie. That's why your board is now a complete desert, because people like you got your way. Out of spite you were willing to spoil it for everyone else. That's a shame, because you and I were always mates. You know how that song by Don McClean, "American Pie" has that line "the day the music died," and how it's about the death of Buddy Holly? Well, if you changed that lyric to "the day the banter died." that song could have been written about me and the day I was banned from your board. I was the most important thing on your board, Ozzie; I kept a small flame of banter alight. It's a real shame that you had to spoil it with your self-obsession.
I have to hold my hands up and say that since Goofy has returned from his latest ban he has been in scintillating form, showcasing the football world his talents in preparation for upcoming transfer windows. Casting aside his long list of indiscretions and general disgracefulness, Sewerez the footballer has now outgrown Liverpool FC and deserves to be playing for a bigger club. At the end of the season if Pool fail to make the top four (which is highly likely) they will no longer hold any cards, Goofy will have only 2 years left on his contract and will not be stupid enough again to sign another one, the Mouse hierarchy will not want a potential £40m player running into the last 2 years of his contract and so will be forced to grant him his wish to leave.
As they're historical events they don't come into the question asked. So no current claim to fame for Spurs without having to delve into the history books?
I think you're purposely being obtuse, Kate. It's not "history" (per se) that us normal fans deride, but the Mouser's propensity to base his team's current worth and cache in the football world entirely upon it. If 'Pool was still winning things and terrorising the best sides across Europe, none of us would have any problem with you constantly bringing up the past, because your current form would fit hand-in-glove with it. But that isn't the case. 'Pool has had zero form for many seasons, now, yet you Mousers continue to dredge up past glories, as though your history is some kind of excuse for your current dreadful form. Another large part of it, I'm sure, is that most ordinary footy fans feel embarrassed by Mousers. Imagine being in a room of foreigners and you are part of a small group of English blokes, and one of your number keeps on boasting, in a very loud voice, about the size of his cock; but everyone in the room knows that the bloke has a very, very small cock and - indeed - all the foreign blokes have cocks that are far, far bigger than the cocks of the English blokes. Surely to God, the last thing you'd want is some twat boasting about his cock! Well, that's how us normal footy fans feel about you Mousers and your boasting about your Glory Days.
You mean like Spurs developing the world's first €100m player? Come back when you develop the world's first €101m player.
And Spurs current claim to fame is? If there isn't one as presumed you are in no position to extract the urine, we constantly remind you that we know where we are in the great scheme of things but your delusion and obsession with us along with your living in a retro world of Cilla Black records and Carla Lane tv series is funny. Also your obsession with big cocks is amusing, keep it up...'cough cough'
Does he currently play for Spurs? Southampton can rightly claim to have found and developed him, Spurs were just a bigger selling platform, but thats enough history.
Does he currently play? Yes he does. Has that fee been topped? No it hasn't. More importantly, so Factitious can stay within FFP, we'll be receiving that fee over six years, so we are still receiving the money, making it a current event. Also, you may need to check your facts - Bale was at Southampton for two years, whilst he was at Spurs for six. Still, at least Liverpool can take pride in their most recent achievement: biggest transfer received for an injury-ravaged striker that had lost any semblance of form several months prior.
He doesn't play for Spurs, he did in the past, but that's history. Currently Spurs are 9th in the table with 13th worst GD in the League. Unless you'd like to give us a clue how long into the past the present becomes history?
When a player is still playing, that is a current event When a club is still receiving money for the transfer, that is a current event When the transfer happened this season, that makes it a current event Not that difficult to understand, is it?
He doesn't play for Spurs does he? Steven Gerrard is still playing so i guess that means his achievements are still current? So you basically are using a Real Madrid player to big up Spurs who sit in a lowly position in the table with a bad GD, ok got it.
In order to develop the world's first €100m player somebody needs to bid €100m for them. How much has anyone bid for Gerrard? Be warned, if you say nobody ever has,m that is an admission that he is worthless - sort of like your grasp on what constitutes a current event, or your foolish belief that the Premier League season finished yesterday.
What, in the name of Beelzebub's balls has that got to do with the price of fish? Our lack of a decent history means that Spurs fans can never call on it. Us Spurs fans are looking to forge a future, not shut ourselves up in the past and claim the world owes us respect for things we did when TV transmissions were in black and white.
That ok Twaddle old chap, we are currently looking to improve in the future also so we're all singing from the same hymnsheet it appears.
