That Mirallas tackle

It's just kids posting **** on a net forum.

No need for a candlelit vigil

 

True, all clubs have them

 

You don't need to defend your fellow blues either. It's not restricted to blues I know full well but we're talking about the Mirallas tackle so the point is relevant.

I leave you to check out rawk as I'm not as interested in it as you appear to be

 

Welcome to Hull Suarez will be welcomed as he justly deserves.If we can stop fighting with ourselves long enough to look at what is happening on the pitch.
Everton seem to be operating a shift system for career threatening tackles.Barry did 2 of our players and Suarez got it this match.Their last home match it was a different one.At least til Big Hair was found out it was him every week under Moyes

 

Certainly is - no matter which team you support, there's no need for it.

Don't know why but Lettuce comes to mind ....

 

No you're seemingly more interested in reading Everton forums & seeking out selective comments to repeat on here, that aim to portray Evertonians in a bad light.

 

See for yourself!.

 

Well I've yet to create a thread from an article I picked up from an Everton site so I guess you're still one up on me

Plus I don't think I've been on rawk at all - so you win that one as well

 

Again, you're condemning our physio for looking out for his own player just like you we're with Gerrards non elbow incident but don't let the double standards bother you there Tobes!

 

Anyway, back to the original point. A player bites another and doesn't even break his skin, yet there's uproar and the PM feels the need to comment on it. A player commits a horror challenge that could have ended an opponent's career, and our Dave says..... nothing. Not about him going relatively unpunished anyway. The same goes for the FA; the ****ers couldn't wait to get their black caps on quick enough after the Suarez bite, but after Mirallas and Rooney? , the Wes Brown atrocity?

Well. life's unfair, innit? Good luck to Mirallas, but even the comments reported today about how he went up to Suarez at the beginning of the game and reminded him of his foul last season in the corresponding game (but honest gov, it had nothing to do with it...) , well if SUAREZ had said that. Bet Dave and the FA would chip in then.

 

We live in culture where we rather vilify Suarez for his diving, biting antics on the pitch etc but still worship the likes of Giggs who cheats on his wife with his sister in law ...

 

TBF, the biting was outrageous and outside normal expectancy whereas a bad tackle happens in every game and is seen as a regularity. People will speak out about a one off event but you won't hear a murmur for something that happens regularly. Hell, I don't want to hear the PM talk, he's a prick!

Miralles clearly went for a revenge tackle IMO. Who "tackles" with their eyes closed?

 

hahahahaha,

Even by your standards, that's a shocker

& you lot wonder why other fans think you're a cult of lunatics.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Well, if other fans think we are all lunatics based on the opinions of one or two of our group, then that just demonstrates the severe limitations of their comprehension and intellect, wouldn't you say?

 

No-one said ALL, but the lunatic fringe is also more than a couple......

 

Definately all off your rockers.

 

This below suggests "all" to me.

But I'm well aware of your penchant for denying you said or meant things you obviously did say (and therefore, presumably, meant) and we'll be engaged in verbal gymnastics until a week on Wednesday so I'll just leave it here.

How's the weather where you are?

 

I'm constantly amazed at just how much other fans think about us at all!