City Till We Die - HDM Article. Tuesday, October 8th, 2013

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Not really....

Same old arguments.... looks to be even some of the same posters on there as here.

At least is shows that not606 is not unique in its divided opinion on this matter.

Cue....Sir Cheshire Ben.
 
The most pointless argument that really gets me annoyed, is the, "When people ask me who I support, I say Hull City or the Tigers"

Completely irrelevant, as yes, we've been known as "The Tigers" since 1904 too, but it's not been our official name printed on e-mails, the badges, the training Ground, the Stadium etc.

Every team has a nickname, and Tigers is ours. It's a nickname not our identity. The two should be kept separate.

I always say, "City" if asked who I support, and if they ask, "City...?", then I just say "Hull".
 
If you don't like the threads about the name change, Robbo, why bother going on them?
 
"A club not a brand"

Sorry, but anyone who thinks that statement reflects reality is thinking proper small time.

You're in the EPL now lads, every club is a 'brand' whether we like it or not. The EPL 'product' is consumed all over the Globe & that's the reason that every club is being guaranteed a minimum of £60m each in TV revenue this season.

Manchester United are the biggest club in the country & their 'brand' is the best known & promoted around the planet, hence the reason they can muster the £113m of sponsorship deals that they have per annum.

If you don't want your club being a 'brand' then the PL is not for you lads.
 
"A club not a brand"

Sorry, but anyone who thinks that statement reflects reality is thinking proper small time.

You're in the EPL now lads, every club is a 'brand' whether we like it or not. The EPL 'product' is consumed all over the Globe & that's the reason that every club is being guaranteed a minimum of £60m each in TV revenue this season.

Manchester United are the biggest club in the country & their 'brand' is the best known & promoted around the planet, hence the reason they can muster the £113m of sponsorship deals that they have per annum.

If you don't want your club being a 'brand' then the PL is not for you lads.

Small time or realistic? I'd say i was realistic.
 
If you don't like the threads about the name change, Robbo, why bother going on them?

Because his life is so empty, he gets his kicks from posting inane ****e on football message boards.

He contributes nothing to this board, other than posting contradictory comments aimed at others.

In other words, he's a ****.
 
Small time or realistic? I'd say i was realistic.

What's 'realistic' about looking to deny that a PL club is a 'brand'?

I hate the expression, but it's a fact about life in the EPL. We're all brands & those who do the best job of promoting theirs, will reap the greatest rewards.

Only yesterday Levy at Spurs sacked off his internal team responsible for the marketing & promotion of the club, & out sourced the task to a company who will look to maximise the value of their 'brand' to sponsors.

Sorry but it's proper small time mate (no offence like).
 
"A club not a brand"

Sorry, but anyone who thinks that statement reflects reality is thinking proper small time.

You're in the EPL now lads, every club is a 'brand' whether we like it or not. The EPL 'product' is consumed all over the Globe & that's the reason that every club is being guaranteed a minimum of £60m each in TV revenue this season.

Manchester United are the biggest club in the country & their 'brand' is the best known & promoted around the planet, hence the reason they can muster the £113m of sponsorship deals that they have per annum.

If you don't want your club being a 'brand' then the PL is not for you lads.
Excellent post.
 
Unlike you OLM ****s are useful. Unlike you I am not a big headed wannabe and feel free to post when I want and where I want to, except the HDM paper, however if you don't want the likes of me and others to post on your MULTI SAME THREAD POSTS go and start a private forum where you can **** yourselves off with your boring same old same old crap.

Originally Posted by Golaccio!
If you don't like the threads about the name change, Robbo, why bother going on them?

This is a Hull City forum is it not?
I happen to support Hull City and have a right to a different opinion to yourself or are you lot trying to deprive me of that too?

<laugh> What a ****er.
 
What's 'realistic' about looking to deny that a PL club is a 'brand'?

I hate the expression, but it's a fact about life in the EPL. We're all brands & those who do the best job of promoting theirs, will reap the greatest rewards.

Only yesterday Levy at Spurs sacked off his internal team responsible for the marketing & promotion of the club, & out sourced the task to a company who will look to maximise the value of their 'brand' to sponsors.

Sorry but it's proper small time mate (no offence like).

Another excellent post. Welcome here any time.
 
"A club not a brand"

Sorry, but anyone who thinks that statement reflects reality is thinking proper small time.

You're in the EPL now lads, every club is a 'brand' whether we like it or not. The EPL 'product' is consumed all over the Globe & that's the reason that every club is being guaranteed a minimum of £60m each in TV revenue this season.

Manchester United are the biggest club in the country & their 'brand' is the best known & promoted around the planet, hence the reason they can muster the £113m of sponsorship deals that they have per annum.

If you don't want your club being a 'brand' then the PL is not for you lads.

Agree with this. Dunno why people rail so much against the word "brand".