HAHAHA![]()
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11695_6970088,00.html << £20 mil + ngog
No, the whole deal is valued at £20m, that includes Bruce's valuation of Ngog which is believed to be £7m.
No, the whole deal is valued at £20m, that includes Bruce's valuation of Ngog which is believed to be £7m.
But I don't know what the Newcastle fan is laughing at, it's hardly as if Barton and Nolan, their best players, are staying!
Are you saying Barton and Nolan simply because they're scousers or do you actually believe that they're good players. I've heard enough times Liverpool fans hate on Barton for me to know you're not fans.
The Mackems hate the Geordies
The Geordies hate the Mackems
But atleast we both hate the bin dippers. Now **** off to your hovel.
Mainly appeared as a sub for Liverpool; 324 mins in first season, 1023 mins last season and 1065 this season = 26 games and 9 goals. Only completed 90 mins twice, hardly likely to be a prolific scorer when making 10 minute substitute appearances.
If we need 4 strikers, they can't all be no 1 and worth £13m, so as number 3 or 4 ok, as long as he hasn't been over valued. Skysports and others are guessing at value and too many on here get carried away with their guesses. If the offer was £18m and is now £20m and includes Ngog, pwerhaps he was a late addition and is only worth £2m ... another guess maybe, but more realistic.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11695_6970088,00.html << £20 mil + ngog
You've misread that.
Are you saying Barton and Nolan simply because they're scousers or do you actually believe that they're good players. I've heard enough times Liverpool fans hate on Barton for me to know you're not fans.
Yes he had. It had been explained.
In The Times (subscription only)