Nando gets 4 ?!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
StanDMan

StanDMan

Well-Known Member
Forum Moderator
Jun 1, 2011
7,555
642
113
FA at it again - hyperactive against us..

more or less Dean is going to accept he missed and result 4 games for Nando!
 
No maybe not..but affected the match wrongly just like you feel it did when he actually did get sent off.
 
**** knows what the op means but I take it's 4 game ban for nando?

good, the judas face scratching fannyboy he is. :D
 
When assessing the ban, the dopes at the FA should remember Torres was wrongly given a second yellow by an incompetent referee. As a fan of retrospective video based punishment, I can't moan about the face scratching incident.
4 matches is wrong, and again shows the stupidity of the FA and their brain dead , unbending rules.
 
Chelsea Pensioner said:
When assessing the ban, the dopes at the FA should remember Torres was wrongly given a second yellow by an incompetent referee. As a fan of retrospective video based punishment, I can't moan about the face scratching incident.
4 matches is wrong, and again shows the stupidity of the FA and their brain dead , unbending rules.
Click to expand...

It's one of those where they've tied their hands so it will either be 4 or 1. It will only be 3 games for the scratching, if he gets done for it, but the extra one cannot be appealed(I don't believe) as it was 2 bookings and bookings can only be reversed in cases of mistaken identity.

Barton had a kind of similar situation where the FA treated each incident seperately and banned him for each red card offence he committed against City.

There can't really be any doubts about the violent conduct charge, should he receive it. Plenty of players have been given 3 match bans for leaning their head into another player, it's just unfortunate for Torres that it coincides with another ban that he can't appeal. Not sure how that shows corruption though.
 
Yid Vicious said:
It's one of those where they've tied their hands so it will either be 4 or 1. It will only be 3 games for the scratching, if he gets done for it, but the extra one cannot be appealed(I don't believe) as it was 2 bookings and bookings can only be reversed in cases of mistaken identity.

Barton had a kind of similar situation where the FA treated each incident seperately and banned him for each red card offence he committed against City.

There can't really be any doubts about the violent conduct charge, should he receive it. Plenty of players have been given 3 match bans for leaning their head into another player, it's just unfortunate for Torres that it coincides with another ban that he can't appeal. Not sure how that shows corruption though.
Click to expand...
3 games for the dumb scratching incident is fair enough, 4 just highlights the crazy situation the FA get themselves into because of their stupidity.
 
Chelsea Pensioner said:
When assessing the ban, the dopes at the FA should remember Torres was wrongly given a second yellow by an incompetent referee. As a fan of retrospective video based punishment, I can't moan about the face scratching incident.
4 matches is wrong, and again shows the stupidity of the FA and their brain dead , unbending rules.
Click to expand...

so,then 6 games for Saurez was wrong as well,i take it?
 
Chelsea Pensioner said:
3 games for the dumb scratching incident is fair enough, 4 just highlights the crazy situation the FA get themselves into because of their stupidity.
Click to expand...

It's not really 4 though, it's 3+1. The automatic 1 match ban is incorrect but that's the way it's been for ages. Excuse me for having little sympathy for him :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back