MJ Gone!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Someone else who only listens to the likes of Talksport etc, and the worst part believes them, as they have never been to Fulham.
We have a statue of Johnny Haynes outside the main entrance to the Stand in Stevenage Road.

Fayed put the Jackson statue in a corner of walkway facing the River because he had wanted it outside Harrods store but had just sold Harrods,
and being a bit of a business man, he marketed merchandise and loads of Tourist to visit for tours to see the statue.

I think most Fulham fans would want to see a statue to Fayed put in it's place, as he has been the person who has saved our club.

Just a bit of banter- I couldn't resist! I know it was originally meant for harrods. I actually quite liked the idea- it was tacky, inappropriate, random but went against the grain of over cautious PR crazy PL world.

Im a southampton fan, we have our own amusing statue story. When our new ground was built a statue of the great Ted Bates was comissioned. A local sculptor was employed and he set to work. Nobody saw the statue until the great unveiling. As the sheet was lifted the crowd recoiled in horror at the grotesque mannequin with only a vague resemblance to Bates, glimmering before us. It was later revealed the artist had never made a statue of a person. Only dogs.
 
I didn't tell anyone how they should feel, tbh I dint care.

dunno why so defensive tbh.

the statue was a ridiculous idea IMO regardless of any cash it may have brung in.QUOTE]

I don't think anyone's being defensive, it's not like any of us were smuggling kids into MJ's room at night. The statue isn't my cup if tea, but lots of visitors and fans did like it.

You made a very interesting 'regardless of cash' comment. We don't have a massive global following like Liverpool, huge revenues from shirts and 50,000 attendances every week - so every penny helps for us. We can't afford to buy the likes of Stewart Downing et al for multiple millions then virtually give him away the next season.
 
I'm reluctant to stir up the Liverpool fans (and yet... here we go). When we were visiting Mrs Captain's parents in Lancashire over the summer we did the Anfield stadium tour. I never realised that the statue of Shankly ('he made the people happy') was heavily branded with the logo of a well known make of lager. It somehow cheapened the whole thing for me. Now, I know that the Jackson statue made us a laughing stock (and quite right too - it was farcical), but seeing such a blatant attempt to cash-in on one of Liverpool's all time heroes made me appreciate just what a great thing our Johnny Haynes statue is.
 
Just a bit of banter- I couldn't resist! I know it was originally meant for harrods. I actually quite liked the idea- it was tacky, inappropriate, random but went against the grain of over cautious PR crazy PL world.

Im a southampton fan, we have our own amusing statue story. When our new ground was built a statue of the great Ted Bates was comissioned. A local sculptor was employed and he set to work. Nobody saw the statue until the great unveiling. As the sheet was lifted the crowd recoiled in horror at the grotesque mannequin with only a vague resemblance to Bates, glimmering before us. It was later revealed the artist had never made a statue of a person. Only dogs.

When are you going to put up a Le Tissier statue? Although, I'm not sure how much more visually-appealing that would be than our MJ one.

:)
 
I didn't tell anyone how they should feel, tbh I dint care.

dunno why so defensive tbh.

the statue was a ridiculous idea IMO regardless of any cash it may have brung in.QUOTE]

I don't think anyone's being defensive, it's not like any of us were smuggling kids into MJ's room at night. The statue isn't my cup if tea, but lots of visitors and fans did like it.

You made a very interesting 'regardless of cash' comment. We don't have a massive global following like Liverpool, huge revenues from shirts and 50,000 attendances every week - so every penny helps for us. We can't afford to buy the likes of Stewart Downing et al for multiple millions then virtually give him away the next season.

yeah i can understand that mate, i actually lived in Fulham (sands end) at the time it went up and remember how well it went down with guys i was working with.
 
Delighted it's gone yet somehow saddened that I never got to see it in person (being the only FFC fan amongst my family and friends doesn't allow me to get to the Cottage very often). It should be replaced with a statue of Mo because of what he has done for the club and as a mark of respect as we know how much he wanted the Jacko statue to stay.
 
I think I'm going to be in a minority on this one, but I don't think we should have a statue of Al Fayed. We've been through the arguments before as to whether or not he saved the club (he didn't. He did a massive amount for us, but it was the board during Jimmy Hill's time to turned things round, saved the club's existence and then handed it on without profit to someone who could take things further. Even if Al Fayed had saved the club, I think statues at football clubs should be of players and/or managers, not chairmen.

I've nothing against Al Fayed. He's been brilliant for us and despite my early reservations he completely won me around. I just don't think we should put up a statue of him.
 
you could use this one? :D
You must log in or register to see images
 
I think I'm going to be in a minority on this one, but I don't think we should have a statue of Al Fayed. We've been through the arguments before as to whether or not he saved the club (he didn't. He did a massive amount for us, but it was the board during Jimmy Hill's time to turned things round, saved the club's existence and then handed it on without profit to someone who could take things further. Even if Al Fayed had saved the club, I think statues at football clubs should be of players and/or managers, not chairmen.

I've nothing against Al Fayed. He's been brilliant for us and despite my early reservations he completely won me around. I just don't think we should put up a statue of him.

Agreed, Captain. If anything, Jimmy Hill should get a statue. Or Bairdinho!

And if we want to fill the cash void left by the departure of the MJ statue, we could always try selling Bryan Ruiz bog roll - half of this board would lap that up!
 
I think statues of great club figures regardless of role is okay actually. Liverpool have Shankley (I think, never actually been to Anfield) and United have both Fergusson & Busby.
 
I think I'm going to be in a minority on this one, but I don't think we should have a statue of Al Fayed. We've been through the arguments before as to whether or not he saved the club (he didn't. He did a massive amount for us, but it was the board during Jimmy Hill's time to turned things round, saved the club's existence and then handed it on without profit to someone who could take things further. Even if Al Fayed had saved the club, I think statues at football clubs should be of players and/or managers, not chairmen.

I've nothing against Al Fayed. He's been brilliant for us and despite my early reservations he completely won me around. I just don't think we should put up a statue of him.


I'm in agreement with all of that Captain. Nonetheless there is an expectation that the Eric Miller, sorry the Riverside Stand, when it's re-developed will be re-named in honour of MAF.

Note the optimism in the "when" 'cos I truly believe it will happen.
 
I think statues of great club figures regardless of role is okay actually. Liverpool have Shankley (I think, never actually been to Anfield) and United have both Fergusson & Busby.

I think you undermine your argument that role doesn't matter by only citing managers here, Fulhaman. You're making my point - every other club only gives this honour to football people (players and managers), not chairmen and administrators.

Cottager, I'd have less trouble with a stand named after Al Fayed (or any other chairmen). Somehow a stand seems a lesser honour. I'd prefer it to be named after a player but I'm not holding my breath. There will never be a Jimmy Hill stand, as we can't have two stands named after people with the initials JH, it would be too confusing adminstratively. How about the Simon Morgan stand as a reminder of where we've come from over the last 20 or so years?
 
Perhaps we should just branch out in a completely different direction start thinking outside the box and ditch all connections with football entirely. How about the Rambling Sid Rumpo stand?

Could be at the forefront of a whole new era for stand and stadium naming. Arsenal's Bruce, nice to see you, to see you nice Forsyth stand, Liverpool's Larry Grayson Shut That Door Stand.

Can see it happening, I really can.
 
From when this story first broke, I've been intrigued by the Club's statement that "It's not in the Riverside Stand redevelopment plans." Especially since I understand that permitting/planning permission takes years, I wonder, was it ever? Is this new news? Does affect anything?
 
And he is no more.

You must log in or register to see images


Consigned to one of MAF's store rooms until he finds another home for it.

You must log in or register to see images


Look forward to not seeing it when I go to see the Stoke game in a couple of weeks.