Ian Black's big day out
- Thread starter Otto Flayshow
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
rogueleader
suave gringo
Yes, he bet against Rangers in the game against E Stirling and 2 games he bet against Hearts (one of which was Spurs).
Big Derek Johnstone reckons it was okay because they were part of an accumulator
He bet against Hearts in two games he didn't play in and took Rangrrs for a draw in a game he scored in to give Rangers a 3-2 lead .
Mibbe that's why the SFA thought there was no evidence of match "fitting"
He was not charged with "Match Fixing" so that probably explains why he was not found guilty of it?
EDGE.
Official POTY 2011, 2014, 2015, 2018 & 2023
Probably wasn't charged because there was no evidence of it . Somebody want to tell Hoopy that ?
Not me. He's a free spirit is Hoopy
Free spirit do you have proof? Well his potato based vodka moonshine is fairly inexpensive I suppose.
rogueleader
suave gringo
As usual with either Rangers 1872 or The Rangers when the SFA are forced into been
involved in, things become muddied and then it becomes difficult to have proper punishment
laid down . Why was BLack given a light sentence of ten matches with seven written off.
a) he plays with The Rangers.
b) Ally McCoist said he did nothing wrong because he has lists is over hundreds of
Officials ( including referees ) who do the same.
c) Black has never been before the disciplinary committee for anything before in his
excellent very sporting football career.
d) The SFA had within its five part agreement that no player from The Rangers could
be given more than 3 match suspension.
e) the SFA knew that after all the fudging and sworn untruths to keep Rangers 1872
From punishment , no one would expect much punishment for poor Ian Black .
involved in, things become muddied and then it becomes difficult to have proper punishment
laid down . Why was BLack given a light sentence of ten matches with seven written off.
a) he plays with The Rangers.
b) Ally McCoist said he did nothing wrong because he has lists is over hundreds of
Officials ( including referees ) who do the same.
c) Black has never been before the disciplinary committee for anything before in his
excellent very sporting football career.
d) The SFA had within its five part agreement that no player from The Rangers could
be given more than 3 match suspension.
e) the SFA knew that after all the fudging and sworn untruths to keep Rangers 1872
From punishment , no one would expect much punishment for poor Ian Black .
[video=youtube;EgqoHyG2FMk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=EgqoHyG2FMk[/video]
Maybe you should be directing these points at someone on the SFA board
You must log in or register to see images
Maybe those who have been at Rangers1872 and The Rangers beck and call over the
Years would have a bigger say than Peter Lawwell who has only been a couple of
months on board the SFA .
No matter how brilliant a job that Mr Lawwell does , it will take generations before
Football is run in a fair honest manner in Scotland.
Years would have a bigger say than Peter Lawwell who has only been a couple of
months on board the SFA .
No matter how brilliant a job that Mr Lawwell does , it will take generations before
Football is run in a fair honest manner in Scotland.
Erm no, can you imagine the outcry if Pete had been part of a committee which had sat in judgement?