As I posted earlier those poor examples, some may be Celtic fans but whether they are or not I am not sure they combined together to form an axis of evil that could be in any way collared to the tens of millions stolen off the Scottish People.
So you think a football club getting into debt is worse than the combined actions of a. A *****phile shagging kids b. A terrorist wanting to blow up an aeroplane full of innocent people c. A neddy racist, head of BNP youth division d. A slimey "war criminal" politican who is partially responsible for the death of thousands of people
Honest answer, do you think Rangers getting into debt is worse than the actions of those people combined?
Has no Employee of Rangers never shagged children. Haven't Rangers lauded and welcomed home soldiers from fighting an illegal war in Irag. Some of these soldiers were responsible for killing that many men women and children , journalists were not allowed to Report on numbers. Medro I suppose you would prefer for yourself or off springs to be blown up by people in British Army Uniform than By someone without a uniform . The Rangers debt came about by Davey Murray insatiable desire to better Celtic. By him making a fool of Craig Whyte and by the SFA and the bank turning their back on the continuous wrong doings under Murray .
Celtsforever believes shagging children is perfectly acceptable. A club getting into debt though, ohhhhh now thats a different story.
I'm not giving an honest answer when two points being made are about "fans" - 1 is not even a fan, just an african wearing a celtic top. That's another debate that would be mind numbingly boring - who has the worst level of scum in thier fanbase. Are you really wanting to debate what is worse - Torbett abusing kids or a company running up millions of debt and leaving 100s of company short of cash? I dont ... they are two - massively - seperate issues. Absuing kids is abhorrent. It's nothing to be point scored on. A company running up huge debts and not paying them and starting again (as debt free) is ****e as well, but on a different - moral? - level.
I didn't even mention Torbett, i was talking about Sir James Savile. Him shagging dozens of kids is a lot worse than a football club running up debt.
Referring to a picture of him with a half Celtic / half Rangers top on??? ...and also desperately trying to compare it in a rake back over various scattergun drivel? Is this like on the BBC 606 when you got all a-fluster because the Seattle Sounders said they didn't want to play "Rangers, Celtic, Barca or Real Madrid" because of political connotations and you took it just to mean Celtic? I don't think you're a real person. You are actually no right, son.
Ah, I thought you where comparing football clubs - celtic v rangers! If comparing *****s v crooks, then yes, I agree...***** crimes are the lowest level you can get...horrible ****s. Swindling cash is wrong also. Dont see the point in thr debate as ***** sex crimes should not be used as a point scoring exercise.
