Celtic already bankrupt?

Meanwhile at Ibrox street thugs join the board.

 

Does that make Dessy any less dodgy ?

Nope it doesn't .

2/10 for your whataboutery there . All these years of practice and your still ****e at it .

 

Aldo, there isn't a billionaire who is honest or who hasn't ****ed over a whole lot of people, legal or not. The way of the world.

You have the poor, Scottish equivilent of Reggie and Ronnie in your boardroom yet you bash your keyboard over dapper Dermott.

People like you deserve Admin2.

 

As dodgy he may be on the dodgy scale he is nowhere near as dodgy as Rangers' previous 3 custodians, 1 of whom was allegedly a billionaire himself.

 

I have edited one post and made one post in reply to you on the subject of DD . A grand total of thirteen words . I didn't bring the subject up and nor do I care much about it .

So hardly bashing any keyboard am I ? Fail.

I have made my feelings on the Rangers board and certain members that are on it in these pages perfectly clear . I did it on the many many relevant threads on that subject matter that have been started in the main by obsessed Timmy . I gave my opinion on those threads because that subject matter was relevant to those threads .

Do you see where I'm going with this ?

As I said , for a tim your whataboutary standatds are ****e

 

Interesting question that . Who is dodgiest ?

The guy who claims to be a billionaire but isn't or the guy who is a billionaire through dodgy dealings ?

I suppose it's all dependent on an individual's moral compass who he deems to be the worst .

 

I know I'll regret asking this but what point are you trying to make?

 

I dunno who is the dodgiest - but i know I prefer having the one who actually has money as the major shareholder of the club I support.

Not actually having money can become a slight issue

 

I think it's a rather tenuous attempt at suggesting an equivalence between Craig Whyte and Dermot Desmond.

Which is nonsense of course. Craig Whyte is far more efficient; he took less than 18 months to kill Rangers, a result Desmond had failed to achieve for many years.

 

please log in to view this image

 

That's one way too look at it I suppose . I would say that Craig Whyte is extremely un efficient when it comes to dodgyness . He has been found out time and again and despite claims his wealth is/was off the scale he was infact skint .

Desmond on the other hand is a very efficient dodgy character . He has managed to acrue an actual fortune through dastardly means and all though he has been implicated on various occasions nothing has stuck yet .

 

Really ? Why ? What does DD actually bring to Celtic ?

 

The numbers are wrong in the accounts?

Where did you get the £10m from?

Young children from Thailand

 

Too true

I distinctly remember that when this extremely "un efficient" dodgy bloke was unfurling a league flag at Ibrox, everybody was giving him a right hard time about being found out.

Naw hang on, it was Chris McLaughlin and the BBC that was finding him out, wasn't it?

Another Rangers history re-write there then Aldo, eh?

 

And your point?

I'll clear things up shall I?

Desmond may be dodgy but as far as I am aware he has done no harm to Celtic. You have seen a succession of - not just dodgy but - corrupt/bent/skint chancers take the utter piss out of your club(s).

And my original point was that DD is worth in excess of a Billion quid, therefore we are not likely to go out of business for £10m quid are we?

 

Same place the *****s who say we are in debt to the tune of £35m did, the accounts.

Do try and keep up.

 

Anybody with google knew that Craig Whyte was a wrong un mate . Not "everybody" welcomed him .

 

And so the historical revisionism begins.

 

Didnt the bbc the sfa and peter lawwell appoint craig whyte as owner of rangers over dave murrays near dead body while riot police held back a tumult of rangers fans on edmiston drive trying desperately to stop him getting in the front door ?