Spot on Colin old son. I said summat similar when he announced his "depression" and got torn to shreds for it.
I've sympathy for anyone suffering mental problems but this is a Football Club/Business we have here, not a rehab clinic.
Diakite & M'Bia ?
- Thread starter WBA2_QPR3
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Spot on Colin old son. I said summat similar when he announced his "depression" and got torn to shreds for it.
I've sympathy for anyone suffering mental problems but this is a Football Club/Business we have here, not a rehab clinic.
Redknapp should be applauded for getting rid of a load of leeches sucking the life out of QPR. And he is managing the situation - by removing unwanted and disruptive elements. So what about the reports in the Franch media saying Mbia never wanted to come and was trying to get back to France?
Why is you accept a story from one source and deny another? I believe Mbia loves Rangers about as much as Cesar and Granero do/did.
Face it, things you post aren't facts; most are your interpretations - like your ridiculous analysis of the tunnel video - which is far from being the same thing.
Deluded.
Opinions are what we make of them ... no problem. I make my own mind up. Leeches? do we know Mbia and Diakite are disruptive?. As we said they are all stories but Harold is on record on iplayer. I back any manager at QPR when it's game on but don't expect me to believe what Harold says. The clue re Mbia/Garnero and Cesar is that they are different people ... it s more deluded IMO to bunch them all together ... this thread is about Diakite and Mbia.
You are suffering from the illness ... the one that some QPR fans don't even know they have got
Take it easy - why should Redknapp be applauded ?
For making Fernandes buy an overpriced, overweight in the beginning? - See you know without me even naming him/her
(By the way - Do you think that good ol egg Arry had anything to do with him going back to Anzhi? Ooh Tony - you got out of that one by the skin of your teeth!
For loaning out Remy when now is when the fun starts in the Transfer Window? How much would Monsieur Wenger be willing to pay now? - And I know he didn't think that was the right deal but he really has some clout with our Tone now heh!
For not managing to manage the cliques? - EVERYONE knew that Hughes had made a total mess of the dressing room and that there were more factions in it than the Annual Factions Conference held at Factions City! FFS - This was the one thing that good ol egg Arry was blinding at!
He keeps telling us how he managed another good ol right wing egg "Nutty Paulo" - Well he did a great job with the one piece of magic we had didn't he?
Should we applaud him that virtually every count on here suddenly has Bastard DumBarton as their Saviour? - Could Dumber not have brought in anything better than this?
Should we applaud him for constantly putting our name into disrepute by constantly needing to feed the Media with his crap and in so doing our crap?
Should we applaud him that somehow he has managed to play Hill instead of Suk Young at left back? Is this to get back at our Tone for not sanctioning the procurement of Bridge?
I have some hope back, but let's not start getting carried away, we have played 3 games, none of them against the better sides in this division - history shows that throughout our Tone's tenure we have been mismanaged by both the Admin and Playing Management, not much has changed and one thing that the Saint has put as a fact but I hazard a guess is -
EVERY single one of the players (And yes I include Bosingwa) could and would have produced far more if we had, had competent management.
Come on you RRRRRRRRRRRs
Ok. Even though he was pretty much a calamity for us, Mbia did put a shift in so describing him as a leech was a bit hasty on my part.
As for Diakite, how can you say he doesn't want to play for HR? The guy was AWOL at the very start on the season - his heart as never been it, unfortunately as he looked good for a bit.
If you read the comment properly, you'll see the unwanted and disruptive element refers to the players already shown the door. Besides, I consider a player - Diakite - who has shown no commitment to the Rs as disruptive and unwanted.
I'm happy with the team and with what HR's trying to achieve. I don't agree with all his antics but I'd rather support the current playing staff who acutally participate.
If either these two come back in, so be it - I'll support them; but let's not pretend their devoted to the Club - there lunacy lies.
As for Diakite, how can you say he doesn't want to play for HR? The guy was AWOL at the very start on the season - his heart as never been it, unfortunately as he looked good for a bit.
If you read the comment properly, you'll see the unwanted and disruptive element refers to the players already shown the door. Besides, I consider a player - Diakite - who has shown no commitment to the Rs as disruptive and unwanted.
I'm happy with the team and with what HR's trying to achieve. I don't agree with all his antics but I'd rather support the current playing staff who acutally participate.
If either these two come back in, so be it - I'll support them; but let's not pretend their devoted to the Club - there lunacy lies.
Hard to deal with such a disarray of nonsense so I'll just respond with a couple of points.
Firstly, you're taking my one specific point and applying to other things - where did I say he should be applauded for speaking to the media?
Yuk is a work in progress - defensively he was suspect against HT and was replaced. Hill did well against Ipswich by all accounts.
You are fooling yourself if you think HR plotted the loans of Remy etc. It would be far more beneficial for him if those players were sold thereby adding money to the transfer fund. Beard is the 'genius' behind those deals - none of them make sense and a number of posters have said the same thing.
Adel is a special talent - but he wanted top-flight football. MH managed to get the best from Adel and its a shame that HR couldn't/wouldn't. However, best not to fool yourself into thinking Adel wanted a return to the Ch.
As for cliques, they been removed and the team spirit is there for all to see - you can check for yourself on the tunnel cam thread.
So you want a second division club such as ourselves to bring a better midfielder than Barton - at this level? Whatever you think of the guy, he's a class performer at this level and has been through it before with Newcastle.
Good that you're in fighting mode not so Super Husky - Going into a meeting where I will disect some wannabees and then come back to the more pressing matter of the day of bringing some elightenment to your mind - Could be a tough job I know but please wait by your screen and make sure it doesn't get too clouded by the bated breath!!!!!
Barton is a Count of the highest order and anyone who sells their soul to kneel at his altar deserves to be in a Macdonalds one night when this Count comes in with the hump. Or maybe just be in close vicinity when he wants to stub out his cigar, or and or, and or. If we couldn't get better than we need to get rid of EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You're lucky the young pretenders need 15 more mins before they go through the Griller!!
Listen, you can have your rose tinted perspective - you're entitled to it - as we are ours - Just don't retort with unthought ramblings - leave that to our good ol egg Arry. And Superhusky - Take this with you through life - Live your values and make sure everything around you lives their as well - Right now I love my club but amazingly dissapointed by accepting this thug, cretin, low life excuse for humanity as an integral part of us - NEVER I say, NEVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRs
Not sure why you're getting personal. I'm prepared to debate the issues but the comments are unnecessary.
Nothing rose tinted about my perspective.
For example, I'm not pretending Hill is a long-term option at LB but Yun was replaced, IMO, because he was caught out on a number of occassions against HT - one of them for their goal. I seem to remember we had a clean sheet against Ipswich. As for the suggestion that it was some sort of swipe at TF for not signing Bridge, well, it's quite ridiculous and based on thin air.
As for Adel, he wanted to leave for top-flight footy. The situation would have been the same regardless of the manager, IMo.
Nothing rose tinted about my perspective.
For example, I'm not pretending Hill is a long-term option at LB but Yun was replaced, IMO, because he was caught out on a number of occassions against HT - one of them for their goal. I seem to remember we had a clean sheet against Ipswich. As for the suggestion that it was some sort of swipe at TF for not signing Bridge, well, it's quite ridiculous and based on thin air.
As for Adel, he wanted to leave for top-flight footy. The situation would have been the same regardless of the manager, IMo.
Actually its Ui Neill as O neill is the Anglised version,
Good post. Doesn't it mean 'the descendants of Neil' or perhaps Niall would be the Irish spelling.
I think in modern Irish it's O with a fada over it, old Irish had Ua or similar right enough but I'm open to correction.
The 'Ui Neill' way of spelling the name is a medieval/early modern form, I think.
Oh, you see young husky, when you are the first to bring out the little revolver classing someone's thoughts as nonsense be prepared for the wrath of Barton to wreak upon you!!!
Sorry matey - (hope that less attacking and more how shall we say matey) Hill is absolute tosh at left back and frankly not that much better at center back. Suk Young you'll find was not at fault against Huddersfield as it was Traore playing - But heh that's probably thin air.
Adel needed to have Prem time - Your thoughts only.
Anyway must dash, just a parting thought before starting to eat it find out what type of beast it is!
It means "The Grandson of Niall". Whereas "Mac" means "Son of". Just a bit of banter lads!
You're both very well informed.
You're both very well informed.
Ok, mate, fair enough. But in all seriousness, please check the line-up for the Huddersfield match - Yun was at LB. Saw the whole thing with my own eyes!
And, besides, telling someone else they're speaking nonsense is not quite the same as implying you would relish them getting beaten up by Barton. So perhaps we're even.
It means "The Grandson of Niall". Whereas "Mac" means "Son of". Just a bit of banter lads!
You're both very well informed.
An interesting diversion! I don't intend this in an inflammatory way (being unsure of any particular affliations these stories might have?), but do you know of the 'Ulster Cycle'? I'm sure you must - great stories.
