I don't know whether that is partly the reason for the change of name but it makes sense and they did say "perhaps" in the statement.
I don't understand, why would the council be bothered by the name change?
I don't know whether that is partly the reason for the change of name but it makes sense and they did say "perhaps" in the statement.
No they just have more important things to worry about.
No they just have more important things to worry about.
Who?
I really can't understand this. I try to judge an argument by the ideas and not who is saying them. The other way seems incredibly shallow.
I accept that if I was in charge of the club and I came up with an idea and a large number of the fans didn't like it I wouldn't go ahead with it unless there was compelling evidence.
Yes...do you think they'll sort out the half time debacle where even if you sprint down for a piss and then line-up for your half-time refreshments, you inevitably end up having to leave the queue because the second half has started.
Yes...do you think they'll sort out the half time debacle where even if you sprint down for a piss and then line-up for your half-time refreshments, you inevitably end up having to leave the queue because the second half has started.
I don't understand, why would the council be bothered by the name change?
Why do they need to change the name to call us something different? Why cant they just leave the official name the same and then use the nickname or whatever nickname they want to give us more prominently? If they think it helps in international markets to call us The Tigers why not just do that. Trademark Hull Tigers etc. I dont really understand the point of changing the name to that unless there is some legal reason that they cant.
I told you, I can't name names, however as at least one of the users to have been contacted is someone I know off the forum as well I know that when they were contacted about it they genuinely were contacted.
I'm sure someone has already said about marketing the nickname rather than ruining the club name.
So we shouldn't comment on any decisions just because the Allam's don't care?
The Allam's are not going to be in charge of this club for eternity. Plenty of fans will be still around when they are long gone.
Should we have used a similar argument when Hinchliffe and Buchanan owned the club?
PS Sorry, I got confused because of all the "*"'s!
Probably, but has anyone explained why that wont work?
What I mean by they pay more attention to some posters than others is that they know from experience that the views of certain users are more likely to reflect the views of large numbers of fans where as other fans are more marginal. For example if it were a matter concerning Adam Pearson they'd probably choose to ignore Percy's views on him as he's a vocal minority rather than someone who is likely to represent the silent (non-posting) majority.
The problem you have, and you may not like it, but your claim that this is unanimously opposed is simply not true.
Similarly if someone were to claim that the majority of fans are FOR the change, then that would equally not be true.
I would suggest up to 25% of fans are venomously against the change, probably less than 5% of the fans are pro the change and the remaining 70% when push comes to shove care more about the team's success than they do the name change.
If you had 100% of fans venomously against this, then the Allams would be in trouble because this would be revolution.
However you don't.
If this were an election, you would probably win because of the low turnout. But it's not. So ultimately as Bruce suggested, this will ultimately die down.
You don't have to like what I'm saying, but you must realise what I'm saying about the general apathy is true.
Why do they need to change the name to call us something different? Why cant they just leave the official name the same and then use the nickname or whatever nickname they want to give us more prominently? If they think it helps in international markets to call us The Tigers why not just do that. Trademark Hull Tigers etc. I dont really understand the point of changing the name to that unless there is some legal reason that they cant.
What a sad indictment of our fanbase that would be if it were true.Happily it's not.
I know people who are angry and they're not even football fans!
I know you can't name names but you must be able to tell me who they are!
Do they not bring beers to you in the stands? Thats what they do here, that way you dont need to miss any of the game. They walk around with coolers and you just pay at your seat. They bring food to you that way as well.