RHC's Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
moreinjuredthanowen said:
ruff.... if you have something to say cheslea's official statement is a lie that they bid but no players fine... but i have to at least take it face value.... on b i agree there is no reason to believe utd will sell to chelsea.

ayway... more heroics needed from bell as england flop again with the bat..... not good at all.
Click to expand...

Thing is Mito, I don't believe (or care at this time really) anything that the clubs or the press are coming out with to be true but to a Chelsea fan everything Chelsea FC say is gospel truth and everything Manchester United say must be a lie. And vice versa when it comes to Shwan!!

Boring.
 
Ruff said:
The God botherer with the hare lip is leader it he club house on -5.

Me man Westwood is chugging along nicely and McIlroy has mande a twat of himself again.

Yeah man, Nike clubs really are as good as Titleist, eh?

Other than that, early days yet.
Click to expand...

Tiger gets on ok with them though. He has always used them hasnt he?

It cant be the clubs fault. he has just lost the plot mentally.
 
Ruff said:
Thing is Mito, I don't believe (or care at this time really) anything that the clubs or the press are coming out with to be true but to a Chelsea fan everything Chelsea FC say is gospel truth and everything Manchester United say must be a lie. And vice versa when it comes to Shwan!!

Boring.
Click to expand...

yes boring.... i just go for face value on a club statement and ignore the rest so for me no player to utd and no sale to cheslea.


anyone for 300 for england and a nervy wait to see what the aussies post.

i fancy if england bat again level we could see a draw.
 
returnofthesweatband said:
Tiger gets on ok with them though. He has always used them hasnt he?

It cant be the clubs fault. he has just lost the plot mentally.
Click to expand...



No, the point being that they would allegedly be just the same, they clearly aren't. They'll take a good while to get used to.

Titleist to Nike is a step down, simple as that.

Titleist make golf clubs, Nike make training shoes.
 
Ruff said:
No, the point being that they would allegedly be just the same, they clearly aren't. They'll take a good while to get used to.

Titleist to Nike is a step down, simple as that.

Titleist make golf clubs, Nike make training shoes.
Click to expand...

had a go with some nike clubs before i bought my callaways. thought they were ****e and only marginally cheaper. Did rory used to use titliest then? thought he was a taylormade player. That said taylormade is owned by adidas isnt it? though i assume adidas bought the company rather than started making golf clubs.
 
He was Titleist. Which are without doubt the best golf clubs you can get!!!

Tiger started out with Titlesist too but only when he was amateur and just into pro.
 
Ruff said:
He was Titleist. Which are without doubt the best golf clubs you can get!!!

Tiger started out with Titlesist too but only when he was amateur and just into pro.
Click to expand...

That's just an opinion though surely. If they were thee best everyone would want to play with them.
 
mcilroy was a tity ball and calloway driver.


anyway... you cannot beat form can you? if bell is the form batsman here his wicket will become truely key in this series.... thank cripes he's on our side...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back