the two legends of the site, disagree with you and you get a gobfull. KJ and Vetch, you are both ******s however for the sake of the site I will shut the **** up and let you rant. btw I do not have a laptop oldie
Unfair to single Dai out !! Now that did make me chuckle Vetch. What about the week of peace we had when he was banned ? I can see exactly where Dreyfus is coming from and he's got a point
Dill,your hatred of Dai is well chronicled, and as a consequence your opinion on him is somewhat tarnished. Dreyfus has complained about Dai and you happily jump on the band wagon. Even while he was away and not posting, you couldn't stop talking about him. Dai is very opinionated,but he's not alone in that. I don't agree with much of what he says,but occasionally he does make valid points. You,on the other hand,condemn everything that he writes,and that's pure prejudice on your part.
There you go again coming to your own conclusions. You know nothing about me yet you pass judgement. I've never said I hated Dai or anyone else so how is my judgement clouded ? You have no idea what I really think about anyone on here, all anyone can do is take best guess about anyone else. So how is my opinion of Dai less valid than Lumber, Swim or anyone else ? One guess I will have is that you seem to be having issues with me at the moment and seem to be spoiling for an arguement, or have I been reading your recent postings the wrong way ?
Dill,let's get one thing clear - I AM NOT SPOILING FOR AN ARGUMENT WITH YOU. Quite frankly,I don't feel the need,and haven't got the inclination. Hope that's clear. We are all supposed to be Swansea City supporters,having the very best interests of the Club at heart. I sit on the fence,looking in at what sometimes resembles a battlefield, with Dai fending off a small army. Under those circumstances I see him as the underdog,and I invariably root for the underdog. I think you have been "reading recent posts the wrong way". Have you ever considered that you may be reading Dai's posts the wrong way? I came to the conclusion that you hate Dai based solely on your anti Dai postings on this Forum,which have been prodigious down the years. If that is not the case then I withdraw the word,and apologise to you. Perhaps you are not aware how you come across,but you sure as heck pick on him. There is a gang on here who have become like minded,and I produced a thread some time ago entitled "Witchhunt",which was ridiculed by some,including your good self. But that was O.K.,I have broad shoulders,but not as big as Dai's. The gang still exists,and has picked up a few more members down the years. I have no wish to alienate those who find Dai a pain,or worse,but,as I have stated on many occasions,he is entitled to air his views. If he wishes to follow Liverpool;be a fan of Brendan Rodgers;make critical comments about the team,management,etc.,when he feels moved,then I think he's entitled to do all of those things - unmolested. You don't have to agree with him,but you shouldn't attack him. He has been following The Swans' longer than most who post here,and that should enable some slack to be cut. Let me conclude by reiterating that I am not looking for an argument,merely making observations based on what I read on this Forum. So,Dill,peace to you,my friend.
Vetch, a few weeks ago the mods came up with a thread and it was about banning someone if 3 or more posters complained about them. I said no to this because I felt Dai would be gone in no time. I then put a thread up to ask Dai to put a stop to it because many people were up for banning him. I clearly stated that I didn't want him banned. Cutting a long story short Dai's answer was to be abusive even when pointed out by others I was defending him. People actually laughed at him because he was so thick he couldn't see it. At that point I put Dai on ignore and left him to it. The man pushes all boundaries and I don't believe for one minute he is a Swans fan. That is how I see him and that is how I treat him No other board had a poster like him to put up with and many on here can see it. If you want to defend him that's your right but don't be surprised if you fall out with a lot of people doing it
We could discuss this until the cows come home,Dill,and not achieve a resolution. I am not defending Dai,per se,as sometimes I also find his posts egregious.He is however a fully paid up member here,and entitled to air his views. Currently I find musty to be far more distasteful than Dai,yet few challenge his appalling behaviour. Why not try organising a ban for him? Dai is picked on;Dai responds in kind;Dai is picked on even more and insulted,and he responds in kind,etc.,etc. The situation continues to deteriorate and will escalate once he returns from holiday. If those that don't like his posts ignored him,the matter would go away,but some refuse to do that,preferring to continue with the problem,which was not initially created by Dai. If fellow posters want to fall out with me for defending free speech and standing up for the bullied,then they are entitled so to do. They will go down in my estimation should they choose that route. I will not be part of a gang,simply because it's fashionable. To quote the great Groucho Marx,"I wouldn't want to be part of a gang that would have me as a member".
The more he posts the more apparent it becomes that musty was removed from the litter before the socialisation process was completed.
Too little too late,Dill. The die is cast and he has been allowed to roam this Forum unchecked for too long.
You're right about that - but then reading your posts could make one assume you hate dai. I mean he's not you older Brother og former gay-lover is he???
Dilli: What's "not helping" is you egging our antipodean friend on as you did last night. As you say, you reap what you sow. Vetch - sorry mate but you are wasting your time. How on earth you've managed to keep your patience is beyond me. For the record my PMs to musty were not insulting or confrontational. I simply asked him politely to stop the crusade he has on at the moment. He refused saying he was going to carry on. I tried again, asking him to think about the good of the forum and others that use it but again I failed. How PM'ing a poster and asking him to stop breaching the rules is offensive to anyone, I really don't know. It's a job that the mods should be doing, by the way. I said that I would post his PMs in an attempt to make him see sense but even that has failed. And he has carried on. I've had 'wad', 'dickwad', 'old man' and more since, as has Vetch. Someone really needs to have a word because this is only going to end one way. This forum is supposed to be enjoyable and he's making it a very unpleasant place right now.
Egging someone on is posting something like "go on Musty give him what for etc etc he deserves it he's a berk" I've done nothing like that so stop telling porkies. For the avoidance of any doubt all I've said is you reap what you sow and what comes around goes around. Musty is an adult and he makes his own choices. I sympathise with Vetch for getting stick from Musty because he doesn't deserve it. You on the other hand I've got no sympathy for because of the way you post. If Musty continues to abuse you that's his choice and not me egging him on. If you can't take it then don't dish it out
I can confirm the Groovy Gang held a meeting last Sunday. Dill is the one with the Black Cap on. http://www.kukluxklan.info/gallery/pages/usa-kkkak02-031.htm
OK lets have this out: "You on the other hand I've got no sympathy for because of the way you post" The way I post? I'm entitled to post any way I like if it doesn't breach the rules. Deal with it. You encouraged musty on your 'Coed' thread by saying: "How can I put this ? Two words and the second one is off. You reap what you sow" and "Just delete then Musty, he's got nothing of any importance to say" How is that 'helping'? 'Porkies'? I think not. "If you can't take it then don't dish it out" What exactly have I 'dished out'? If I breach the rules I expect a mod to tell me. I haven't been told any such thing. So please, I'm asking. Cut and paste the comments I have made that breach the rules. I've done it for yours and musty's. "Comments that are calculated to antagonise" ring a bell? So please, cut this crap out. We don't like each other and that's fine. Why you took me off Ignore I really don't know because things have got a lot worse recently and it's affecting the forum. If it helps I won't be posting much if at all this coming season because of this **** so that should please you and your mates. Peace.
