It is amusing to watch them all try and copy Ginger Marks' old arguments Now there was a Chelsea fan who knew his football
Here we go again, defending well is negative. I don't know who you support Diego, I'm guessing Barca but all this killing football stuff is becoming boring, if every team set out to score more than the opposition without ever considering defending when the odds are against them, then an underdog would never win anything. So stop your anti defensive football rant, after all it is part of the game.
I know that, look at the post was replying to, i was having a pop back. I am a United supporter and appreciate the need for a solid defenve.
Oh great! a Pikey who knows just about **** all about football now comments on something he knows very little about. McNeill had the better win ratio which speaks volumes on how much better he was the bacon face. fergie couldn't beat that and basically won the the trophy with another mans team. Try doing some research before you spout your qpr championship **** here sonny.
Win ratio means **** all, win ten lose ten you get 30 points, win eight draw seven you get 31 including three loses. What was their loss ratio?
How was it McNeill's team if he was only there for a year? Surely if Ferguson made no or few signings and had the success he had then that's just excellent management given his resources. If Mourinho wins the double after adding a small number of players it doesn't mean he won it with Benitez' team. Win ratio only seems to matter to Sky Sports News. And Angry Oz, presumably.
