Han Shot First
Well-Known Member
Does anyone really think that any of the top teams would blithely allow another top team to conduct an exclusive three day tyre test using this year's car?
Probably not.
Does anyone really think that any of the top teams would blithely allow another top team to conduct an exclusive three day tyre test using this year's car?
Does anyone really think that any of the top teams would blithely allow another top team to conduct an exclusive three day tyre test using this year's car?
Miggins said:nah, people might remember pirelli, but if they do it'll be burned into them to associate Pirelli with tyres that fell apart and wore out so quickly that racing drivers did nothing but complain, they are selling a product not celebritism, being well known for having a crap product is not good marketing.
This wouldn't have happened if Ari Vatanen was FIA boss.
This wouldn't have happened if Ari Vatanen was FIA boss.
)Does anyone really think that any of the top teams would blithely allow another top team to conduct an exclusive three day tyre test using this year's car?
Lot of guests viewing this thread, up to 64 now. Want to sign up as it only takes 60 seconds, no pre-mod waiting either (and no adds when signed in).
Theres a welcome thread: http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/199918-F1-2013-Welcome-thread?p=4796983#post4796983
But thats just if you want, feel free to jump right in![]()
I did not realise it would be this bad, seems like the FIA are pretty pissed off which blows Brawn/Lauda's argument that they ran everything by them. This I feel will have horrible ramifications for the sport either way I do not want to see a tyre war if people thing things now are a lottery go and watch the race at Indy in 2003. Either way Pirelli have been caught with their pants down along with Merc and both will be hit pretty hard by this.
Also why did Mercedes not send Davidson for this test? Surely if they knew it might get found out about they would not look so bad if a test driver had been in the car as opposed to their two drivers racking up the mileage.
He was on the grid today, and it just reminded me how annoyed I was he didn't get chosen. Current events are only compounding the impression that Todt couldn't organise an orgy in a whorehouse. (Come back Max!)
The only possible reason would be that the seat didn't fit a test driver but that seems a bit flimsy.
I'm hoping more will come out from this story, I get a feeling we've only seen a tiny bit of the problem. If Mercedes really do have FIA approval then the problems with the FIA and Pirelli. If the FIA are worried about it getting to late to find a new 2014 supplier what will they do with Pirelli? I feel the FIA are in a mess and in the end it'll fall on Bernie's shoulders to make up some gossip and make it blow over...
I'm hoping more will come out from this story, I get a feeling we've only seen a tiny bit of the problem. If Mercedes really do have FIA approval then the problems with the FIA and Pirelli. If the FIA are worried about it getting to late to find a new 2014 supplier what will they do with Pirelli? I feel the FIA are in a mess and in the end it'll fall on Bernie's shoulders to make up some gossip and make it blow over...
I can't imagine the FIA would've agreed to Mercedes testing this year's car. The testing ban is such a fundamental part of the regulations these days, especially with the need to cut costs while the global economy's in a mess. There would had to have been lengthy discussions and unanimous agreement amongst the teams for them to agree to that. They wouldn't have just said "oh go on it will be fine". It's a huge decision to make.

Incredibly flimsy, I can't imagine any team turning up at a race without a provision for a driver being taken ill/injured. You could argue that if they were running both cars then it stopped them picking a driver, but if that was a serious concern then Sam Bird was there for the GP2 program anyway.