Desailly - "Bale should go"

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
How did Joe Lewis come into wealth and how much is he currently contributing to UK tax whilst average families struggle to make ends meet and austerity is amongst the mass populous?

Oh, I see, let's change the subject. And is Joe Lewis a U.K. Resident?..Abramovich presumably is..
 
Bitter? Is he ? You know him personally then? I'd say he was just a tad more pragmatic. Yes, we'd like to see the wallet opened, but arbitrarily spending £50mil on a player that he wants himself? Nah, that ain't gonna happen.
The irony is you and the rest bring up that 50 million pounds we spent on Torres you fail to see that he makes Chelsea millions in shirt sales infact the third most sold shirt in world football last year was Chelsea 9 Torres.
 
London's third or fourth club always was a selling club and small fry.

Poor deluded souls<ok>

Given your user name I guess you can remember when Chelsea were London's fourth club just before the Osgood era when West Ham won a European trophy, Spurs.ruled the roost and Arsenal were just a sleeping giant. I concede its all changed now but I'm sure it will all change again
 
The irony is you and the rest bring up that 50 million pounds we spent on Torres you fail to see that he makes Chelsea millions in shirt sales infact the third most sold shirt in world football last year was Chelsea 9 Torres.

If that's true, fair enough. However, my point was that it was Abramovich, and Abramovich alone who arbitrarily decided to cough up £50mil for a player who clearly had already lost something of what he was. If he has recouped some of that on shirt sales, I would guess that is more by luck. And, if he has recouped something he's certainly done better than his last impulse buy - a certain Mr Shevchenko!
 
If that's true, fair enough. However, my point was that it was Abramovich, and Abramovich alone who arbitrarily decided to cough up £50mil for a player who clearly had already lost something of what he was. If he has recouped some of that on shirt sales, I would guess that is more by luck. And, if he has recouped something he's certainly done better than his last impulse buy - a certain Mr Shevchenko!

Luck dont come into it Torres still sells shirts because there are still lots out there that still idolise him even if he's gone off the boil over the last few years.
 
Given your user name I guess you can remember when Chelsea were London's fourth club just before the Osgood era when West Ham won a European trophy, Spurs.ruled the roost and Arsenal were just a sleeping giant. I concede its all changed now but I'm sure it will all change again

Rules what? You had 2 good seasons and did very little in the next 50.

Chelsea have never been London's 4th side, even when 2nd division.
 
Given your user name I guess you can remember when Chelsea were London's fourth club just before the Osgood era when West Ham won a European trophy, Spurs.ruled the roost and Arsenal were just a sleeping giant. I concede its all changed now but I'm sure it will all change again

You haven't ruled the roost since 1961 pal and they didn't even have colour when that happened <laugh>

Maybe you can console yourself by watching the Spud cd review of the season which runs 36 games.<ok>
 
No I don't. So how do you know?

Ok, quick history lesson. In 1996 Yeltsin was about to be deposed by a resurgent communist party. In return for their support, he offered very lucrative state assets at knockdown prices to Abramovich & Berezovsky, especially.

To be fair, it was essentially Berezovsky who stabbed Yeltsin in the back by creating he Unity party & promoting a certain Mr.Putin. We all know how that one turned out.

Where Abramovich has been smart is in that he hasn't attempted to play politics. He also "agreed" to sell back to the state, in the form of Gazprom, his majority stake in Sibneft. Not that I think Putin gave him too many options!..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.