Torres

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.

Englandfor2014WC

Active Member
Apr 27, 2013
221
29
28
NULL
What a great goal tonight, very composed! Would you have him back? A champions league win and possibly a winning goal in another European final. Wasnt the worst decison to leave as he has won everything in world football other than the league now.

Him and Suarez up front could be tasty
 
Would I take him back? No!

Given the opportunity to go back in time, would I still sell him? Absolutely!
 
Englandfor2014WC:4747227 said:
He has scored over 20 goals this season. Not too bad for someone who is supposedly rubbish

No one here as called him rubbish!
 
He's looked sharp at times this season and the goal tally speaks for itself.

Wouldn't have him back though,I'd take Suarez over Torres every time.
 
organic red:4747426 said:
He's looked sharp at times this season and the goal tally speaks for itself.

Wouldn't have him back though,I'd take Suarez over Torres every time.

I'd take Fowler over both!
 
Englandfor2014WC:4747585 said:
Haha, I assume you saying Fowler was better than either Torres or Suarez is a joke??

Where did I say that?
 
I'd take Fowler over both!

I call him Dad.

And lo, Jesus did turn to Gerrez and say, "blessed be you, my child, for I hath used my hundredth post on thee". And it came to pass that Gerrez was surrounded by angels as there, before him, Jesus became a senior member.

Jesus did dance as if riding a horse, like the prophet Psy, and Gerrez did put the kettle on.
 
The irony is that he's played the worst football in his career while enjoying the best spell of his career in terms of trophies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.