I don't want to be seen as a Hess basher but I feel that there is a lot of romantacism surrounding Hess and Gillingham. As a player Hess, no arguement has to be amongst the most talented players to pull on a blue (or red) shirt, but as a manager he clearly had/has some flaws.
Yes he did manage the most successful spell in the clubs history, but if Allen's achievements are downgraded due to inheiritng a "good" squad the same must be said for the team Hess he recieved from Pulis/Taylor. We may have reached the pinnacle of the club's achievement with Hess but we also began the slow spiral downwards that lead the club's to return to the basement division. In his first spell at the club Hess failed to maintain the quality of the squad, we lost amazing talents in Smith, Hess, Iffy et al under his tenure which he simply couldn't replace.
It is ironic that then that Hess was the manager who stablised the club on his return and was the force tha brought the club and the fans back together. However he second spell has to be classified as a failure, the "anything but promotion will be a failure" statement holds true, we weren't promoted under Hess despite a large financial backing from Scally. He did do a lot for the club though, steadied the helm and no doubt brought in some good players which Allen has benefited from, but Hess simply could not get the team to play at a higher enough level consistantly enough to gain promotion. Yes we saw the potential in the odd game (Bristol mentioned the Swindon game) but to often we came up wanting on the pitch under Hess.
Now under Allen we are promoted, does that mean he is "better" than Hess? Hard to say as we all stand on the shoulders of giants. However I think Allen was the right man for the job, Hess had taken the club as far as he could and it was the right time for him to go upstairs. Allen should be congratulated for his success without his acheievments being belittled but it would be unfair not to acknowledge Hess' role in the process as well