I didnt think he was great tbh.
He was better in the final quarter of the game and the 2nd goal gave him confidence and he tried very hard all game. No doubting that. But he was pushed off the ball easily and barely won a tackle (bar a couple and the one for the goal).
Our midfield didnt have control at all as a unit, and him, mbia, and granero gave the ball away alot.
I didnt think he was great tbh.
He was better in the final quarter of the game and the 2nd goal gave him confidence and he tried very hard all game. No doubting that. But he was pushed off the ball easily and barely won a tackle (bar a couple and the one for the goal).
Our midfield didnt have control at all as a unit, and him, mbia, and granero gave the ball away alot.
I thought Granero was shocking and gave the ball away a lot - which is why he had to be substituted. Mbia did pretty well and gave the ball away less than he has recently - but imo Park was excellent: harrying, covering loads of ground, denying players space and just generally making a nuisance of himself. In one word : effort.
It's funny how two people can see a game so differently. Just read a guardian report saying what a good job mbia did. My mate thought samba looked a bit roper and the guardian gave him man of the match! Oh it's a funny old game!
What's the answer then? I only saw the last 30 minutes and highlights on MOTD, and I'm incapable of making my mind up without looking at a poll on a message board.
Good news. Perhaps this good players turn **** when they pull the hoops on curse is lifting.The answer is that Park had far and away his best game for us Sb.
Good news. Perhaps this good players turn **** when they pull the hoops on curse is lifting.
All about opinions mate. I thought Park had his best game for us. Looks like the majority on here agree, looking at the poll.
I thought Granero was shocking and gave the ball away a lot - which is why he had to be substituted. Mbia did pretty well and gave the ball away less than he has recently - but imo Park was excellent: harrying, covering loads of ground, denying players space and just generally making a nuisance of himself. In one word : effort.
As for Park, he just needs to wear longer studs.
I didnt think he was great tbh.
He was better in the final quarter of the game and the 2nd goal gave him confidence and he tried very hard all game. No doubting that. But he was pushed off the ball easily and barely won a tackle (bar a couple and the one for the goal).
Our midfield didnt have control at all as a unit, and him, mbia, and granero gave the ball away alot.
Yep seems most do agree, and thats the beauty of football. I cant see it myself. He frustrated the hell out of me tbh.
I agree he put in a good shift and tried very hard, but imo was easily pushed off the ball. As were Granero and Mbia. Park wasnt alone in that. I really do think Park is one step behind most of the time and his 'covering of ground' is more running around like a headless chicken type of thing. But as col said, its all about opinions I guess.
I think some of the comments on here only go to show that some fans find it very hard to forget how badly a player has played in the past and then, when he does put in a better performance, they still can't see it. I know, because I struggled to admit that Bosingwa had played well..........but he did.
I really hope that Park gets a good reception on Saturday!
I wouldn't play him